Farenheit 451 V Utopia

1278 Words6 Pages
Thomas More and Ray Bradbury’s novels both present thoughtful views of what the future potentially holds for mankind. Although separated by over 400 years, both authors were keenly interested in their worlds and the direction those worlds could take for better or for worse. Their ideas are conveyed clearly through the elements of the narrative, particularly the structure, the language used and characterization, and although mankind has never found More’s utopian paradise we have however come closer to realising Bradbury’s nightmare vision. Thomas More’s “Utopia” presents just that-an ideal, altruistic society, free from the burdens of the then present world. The novel is a satire of European society in the early 1500’s, addressing current problems and suggesting feasible solutions. The novel was More’s mode of communicating his ideas about contemporary society. He uses irony to hide his criticism, and attempts to tell the ideas through using other people as sources. This was in order to avoid punishment and to fulfil his aim- “to tell the truth with a laugh”. “Fahrenheit 451”, Ray Bradbury’s novel, presents a darker image of what the future could be with an eerily futuristic and glum tone. It is a world where there is no individual thought, and books are seen to cause conflicts. “We burn them to ashes and then burn the ashes. That's our official motto.” The firemen who have a responsibility to protect the people, ironically burn books filled with history and thought. The government caters to people’s material needs, and prevents them from thinking too deeply on matters. The society featured in the book takes the approach that “ignorance is bliss” and that it is easier for people not to know, and therefore they will stay happy. “Fahrenheit 451” follows the typical novel structure, with rising action leading to a tense climax and a conclusion that sees the

More about Farenheit 451 V Utopia

Open Document