As an example in 2004 four people were elected senators in waiting but only one was appointed to the senate. Several problems could be avoided if these people we elected rather than being appointed by other members of government. The people of Canada would then be better represented if this was done. This would probably eliminate backroom deals that happen now to get these positions. People would then have to show that they are qualified for these positions rather than donate money which is just a way of buying the job.
Regrettably, Byfield doesn’t give a sturdy case, and with misled facts and statistics, it’s hard to be influenced. Byfield starts by referencing a study that many young couples are focusing on their jobs and waiting until later in life to have children, or simply not having children at all. According to the essay, Canada isn’t one of the countries that has had “much ballyhooed ‘population explosion’” that would “crowd the world with wall-to-wall people” (222). Really, he’s suggesting quite the opposite, that the population we have could “wreak great havoc on the economies of much of the western world’ (223). He believes that the government is simply telling us these things because they would hate to admit that they were wrong in their earlier speculations.
Since extraction is being done in foreign nations, why should the Canadian government intervene? It should be the job of the government of that nation to protect its people. If more intervention is to occur it would hurt Canada’s extraction industry, which is also one of Canada’s largest industries bringing in a lot of wealth and opportunity to our country. According to the neoclassical approach, much of this would have not been possible. With more government intervention, potential multi billion dollar extractions could be put on hold or completely lost due to villagers in that area who refuse to move.
The government duties also make it difficult for small players to enter Canadian market. WilsonArt and Formica are able to overcome these barriers as they had attained a certain scale in manufacturing and procurement. The product
For instance, foreign investors or local investors will no longer see an incentive to invest in the Canadian agricultural and manufacturing market. Therefore, economic growth in energy sector and reduction of growth in agricultural and manufacturing sectors will cancel each other out which results as the stagnant state of economy. Furthermore, the oil industry itself, in regards to general labor, only requires minimum education level and skills that can be obtained easily by training (Hosein 78). As a result, when resource boom starts to decrease, workers that are no longer needed by the oil sector would no not be sufficient in finding other line of work – creating displaced workers in one geographical location. If this is the economic growth that oil industries are emphasizing, they are certainly looking in one
These people are protected in many ways by the Canadian government. However, if Quebec becomes a separate country, these people will lose their protection and benefits. They have threatened uprisings against the movement for many years. Finally, Canadian polls in recent years lead me to believe that French-speaking Canadian citizens are not as supportive of the movement as they have been in the past. There does not seem to be as much media coverage of the movement in the past decade compared to the early years.
Canada and immigration policies have never really gone together until the last twenty to twenty five years. Only then did Canada realize that immigration isn’t a bad thing and that we were mistreating the people that wanted to come to Canada. Think of back when the Canadian Pacific Railway was being built. WE promised these people so much only if they came to work here, and we tricked them. The land that promised them this stuff was obviously not the promise land.
“One of the first consequences of the discovery of the union was that Jurgis became desirous of learning English. He wanted to know what was going on at the meetings, and be able to take part in them.” (Sinclair 83). Unions would also teach members the way of the democracy versus wherever they were from such as Russia, Germany, and
Who gets in? a) Summary b) Theoretical approach c) What I have learned d) Previously held biases revealed in the paper e) Conclusion The Canadian states official public pronouncement, Rhetoric’s with respect to immigration objectives and benefits are very often not matched by Reality, what actually happens. The Canadian state develops its immigration policies to address what it hopes it can control but forgetting that other forces like global trade, Canadian economic performance and transnational migrant’s network play a significant role in determining what actually takes place and as a result, actually policy outcomes are often significantly different from those advanced in rhetoric. The state focus more on the
However, if Aboriginals are seen as being a part of the Canadian community, as they would through “citizens plus,” then they would be far more likely to receive a better flow of resources from the government (CRIC 2). A third advantage of “citizens plus” is that it encourages Aboriginals to participate in both the federal and provincial government by voting, and/or running as candidates (CRIC 3). Lastly, self-government does not take into consideration the needs of Aboriginals living in urban areas (CRIC 3). “Citizens plus,” on the other hand, would more adequately address the needs of both urban Aboriginals, and those living on reserves (CRIC 3). This is due to the fact that the special rights given to Aboriginals under a “citizens plus” approach could be applied to all members of this group, regardless of where they