There is several important news that needs to be heard and seen, but the TV news wants to bring in more audiences. In other words, the TV news would rather talk about cliché or useless topics instead of talking about the crucial events that had occurred, just for high ratings. Obviously, this shows that TV news want to make stories interesting by either talking about random topics or simply making an exaggerated story; thus, TV news are always biased when it comes to telling a
The central claim of Steven Johnson’s article would be that watching TV makes you smarter. Steven Johnson states, “…the culture is getting more cognitively demanding, not less.” The author is trying to point out that to follow today’s television shows are a lot more complicated than shows back in the day. “24” as an example, before watching any random episode you would need to know the characters, make social connections between characters, and so on and so forth. Steven Johnson hopes that the readers will feel smarter for watching TV after reading his article. For
Whether many would prefer to admit or not, advertising has changed society- modifying the way Americans think and act in today's day and age, though not entirely for the better. Over the years, the wants and luxuries of Americans have progressively changed into their "needs", caused by the numerous persuasive advertisements that convince the viewers that their life would drastically improve if only they had the said product. As Sesana states, "they create unfulfilled desires... to buy products we don't need", referring to the strategies used by advertisers to create a driving want to self-indulge for the customers (Source F). Separate groups are targeted in different ways in order to appeal to the different wants of each group, thus making the want that much stronger (Source H). These tactics summon a sense of need that, in turn, cause people to believe whole-heartedly that the product is a necessity, however, in reality, it is merely a luxury.
Steven Johnson argues that today’s shows make viewers follow many plots, sub-plots, and characters, allowing for more mental stimulation, and as a result makes them smarter. Granted, contemporary shows provide more opportunities for mental deduction and speculation of future events than programs in the past, but Americans are still wasting their time watching television. Whether or not the shows “make them smarter” is not a scientifically proven fact, and there have been twelve medical studies since 1985 linking excessive television watching to increasing rates of obesity (Johnson, Trubey). Although scientists have not proven that watching television makes you smarter, scientists confirm that television leads to obesity. One might try reading a book while on an exercise bike, training the body and mind.
In my opinion it will be very hard to balance between the rights of both groups on this issue because there is people for it and people against it. I really don’t see the big problem. I know when peoples make movies that expect to make a big profit. Whether their is peoples who is buying the movies than making lots of copies than selling to peoples cheaper than the original cost of the movie. Nine times out of ten peoples gone go the cheaper way.
They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that is power.” In a world that has become so dependent on media for both news and entertainment, it’s important to understand how this power, or if I dare say weapon, is monitored and regulated. It’s also important to understand how it developed over the years. I believe that Malcom X in his speech was referring to Mainstream media and the power it holds or at least held. Power that I think was transferred to a different entity with the emergence of what is now known as “New Media”. In fact, many people believe that new media will one day replace traditional mainstream media outlets.
TV was able to broadcast news and media, therefore | | |causing the radio stations to lose money and forced them to cutback. People must learn how| | |to keep up with current technology This is the only way they can keep with the times and | | |still keep their audience. If people cannot get the information from one source they are | | |going to turn to another one. The technology term of media convergence has changes a lot
As the technology era advances, people are gravitating closer to a television where as reading a newspaper is considered an interest from the past. The television audience is failing to realize the main point of T.V., including news programs, is to keep people watching so that sponsors and others can make more money through ratings and increased interest in products. In “How to Watch T.V. News”, Neil Postman and Steve Powers state “Anyone who relies exclusively on television for his or her knowledge of the world is making a serious mistake” (x), This statement is true, for television news is not solely reporting what actually occurs. Rather it is reporting what T.V.
By capitalizing on thrillers like aggression, much of entertainment has distorted human character and promoted violence. Many producers exploit violence because sensational material sells; chances for a show's success increase about 16% if it is violent. Sex, violence, and profanity in movies have therefore increased in the past decade.
Synthesis Essay The impact of the television on the people of this country has greatly increased throughout the years. However, the influences portrayed from the televisions are not always for the better. The media tries its best to send information to the people, but on the topic of presidential elections, there is always controversy. It seems to appear that the television has had “unsuspected” help to make the presidential elections focused more on which candidate is more impressive on screen, then who is presenting the finest ideas. The president’s image is important in a campaign, but it should not be the main factor to which they deserve to be sworn into office.