Describe And Evaluate One Study Of Obedience

886 Words4 Pages
Describe and evaluate one study of obedience from a country other than Milgrams (12) - Meeus and Raaijmakers (1986) Description The study of Meeus and Raaijmakers was carried out in the Netherlands twenty years after Milgrams study it was to test obedience in a way which would do harm but in a more up to date way more (psychological than physical). In the 1980’s the Dutch culture was more liberal than early 1960’s American culture. The intention was to see if the power of obedience to a higher authority would still apply in a different cultural setting. The procedure was like Milgrams the volunteers were recruited through a newspaper advertisement and paid a small sum of money of £13, there were 39 participants aged 18-55 both male and female. 24 of these were allocated to the experimental group and 15 were put in a control group. This experiment took part in a modern university building and the experiment lasted about 30 minutes. The participants were given the role of an interviewer and ordered to harass a ‘job applicant’, who was actually a confederate, to make him nervous during a test to determine if he would be capable of the job. The participants thought the experiments were researching the relationship between psychological stress and test achievement, they were also told that the applicant did not know the real purpose of the study they heard the applicant being told that poor performance on the test would not affect their job prospects and that the job being applied for was real. The applicant, listening via a speaker in a different room, had to answer 32 multiple-choice questions read out in four sets by the interviewer. The harassing consisted of 15 negative statements; these appeared on a TV screen telling the interviewer what to say and when to say the harassing comments 5 each for the second, third and fourth question sets, the comments built from
Open Document