Critically Evaluate the Role of the Cps

1502 Words7 Pages
Critically evaluate the role of the CPS (14 marks) Before the Crown Prosecution Service’s (CPS) establishment in 1986, prosecution brought by the state were conducted by the police. The majority of people believed that the investigation of crimes should be separate from the prosecution of cases and disagreed with the police’s role in the prosecution. The Phillips Commission led to the enactment of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE) which stated that there was no uniform system of prosecution in England and Wales. Then the CPS was established by the prosecution of Offences Act 1985 later to begin in 1986. The CPS was created to conform to specific roles and functions. These included the CPS deciding what offences should be charged, reviewing cases to check for sufficient evidence to proceed, and being responsible for the case etc. However the CPS, for the majority of its time, did not partake in its roles and functions effectively as just one criticism present in the CPS is its number of discontinued cases. Therefore the CPS is subject to criticism and this essay will fully explain how it is so. There are four functions of the CPS and these consist of them deciding what offences should be charged, reviewing cases to check for sufficient evidence for case to proceed, being responsible for cases passed to them from the police and finally conducting the prosecution of cases in the Magistrates and Crown Courts. However not all these functions were executed to a sufficient enough standard and there were criticisms present in the CPS’ roles and functions. The main criticism included the sheer amount of cases that were discontinued. The CPS was responsible for 38% of cases that were dropped in 2004. This caused delays which consequently resulted in taxpayers paying over £173 million with £24 million being attributed to the CPS. A case that emphasizes the CPS’

More about Critically Evaluate the Role of the Cps

Open Document