Some parts of the constitution are not fit for today's society, for instance the 2nd Amendment after many terrible events most recently Sandy Hook. The amendment process is too difficult and thereby this makes it almost impossible to remove parts of the constitution that is no longer applicable, this is also the case with adding parts which is needed or a majority desires. The supreme court has too much power to amend the meaning of the Constitution, with each Judge as well getting to serve life at the court. District of Columbia lacks representation in Congress. Roughly 600,000 people live in the area, they pay taxes and serve in the US military do not get representation.
0Wal-mart Grapples With RFID: 1. Describe some RFID applications that might pose a threat to privacy. What information does RFID enable them to track? RFID is a type of an automatic identification system that enables data to be transmitted by a portable device, called a tag, which is read by an RFID reader and processed according to the needs of a particular application. Because of their inconspicuous nature, these tags are not really visible and may pose a threat since people are not aware that they are carrying those tags or that someone might be reading information from them.
It will end up as the same problem as drug trafficking or maybe become worse and even more dangerous. Importing handguns may be a lengthy process, but the criminals will still be able to get their firearms and the law abiding citizens would be left with little to no protection. The second amendment of the US constitution states that as a citizen from the U.S., we own the right to bear arms. There are more than 20,000 laws that control citizens to buy and use firearms (LaPierre 308). Government officials keep creating laws that tend to slow down the process of owning a handgun, but it doesn’t solve the issue that crime still exists in this country.
This could be especially true in the case of researching court proceedings as it is unlikely many researchers have gone through one themselves. Recordings could also be tainted as researchers must rely on memory as notes cannot be made openly. However, this research method is arguably far more useful than just collecting statistical data. Covert observation has long been regarded as unethical. This is due to an absence of informed consent from participants, however Humphreys justified covert observation by suggesting it is the only way to study
Criminal behavior would all be situational are we assuming that I’m a law abiding normal citizen or what. If this is pertaining to the me here and now then these factors are kind of pointless to make most of them minus the drug issue. Then again what types of criminal behavior are we talking is it j-walking shoplifting grand theft auto or anything like these. Honesty and dishonesty are always factors in self-report studies simply because when someone lies or is dishonest on a self-report study they then jeopardies the whole study there is no real way to tell if someone is telling the truth on a study or just simply filling in the blanks the way they think that someone would like them filled
Furthermore the case stated that there was actually no audit work that was done, and Madoff’s cousin was the sole practitioner conducting the audit. These factors raises serious questions of obvious bias and unethical practices involved in performing the audit. Another solution is to provide a safe environment or an outlet for individuals to disclose their potential concerns of fraud. For instance, an outlet such as fraud hot line may have encouraged those who turned the other cheek to come forth. Between the two alternative solutions, I believe that the first solution of tightening the review process of the SEC would be most effective in combating the problem statement.
If this bill were to be passed it would hold the agencies accountable for uploading criminal history records. This bill being passed would not strengthen the checks but it would make sure that they stay updated. I think this is a good idea because this could result in guns not being sold to people with criminal backgrounds. Then again, this bill does not fully help the school shootings happening across America. If a kids parent has the consent to
Wal-Mart Domination Wal-Mart is the largest corporation in America and has stores throughout the country and world. Many people have different thoughts and viewpoints of Wal-Mart and the debate over whether it is good or bad for America is still in question. Wal-Mart is the second largest job supplier in the United States behind the government. However it pays their employees minimum wage which is nearly impossible to live off of especially if you have kids. Wal-Mart like to portray itself as a seller of American products however the main problem is that it outsources all of its work and is full of shelves with items mad in foreign countries, mainly China.
He states that there is no critical thinking involved with creating such vague and inconsistent “jargon” in texts because the over-complexity of the words involved with modernized English leaves the intention of the writing unclear. From the perspective of George Orwell, the modernized English style of writing is nothing more than a set of equivocal standards that we all adhere to. I agree with his essay regarding politics and English language. The lines between critical writing, professional, and political language have been blurred. We may attribute the deterioration of English writing with political language.
There are hundreds of millions of guns in America. So, eliminating the ability of people obtaining some either illegally is impossible. A black market is likely to occur if guns were made illegal(Farago). It is already evident that illegal guns are being used in far more gun crimes than legally bought ones. Seventy-nine percent of all gun crimes in Pittsburgh for example were committed by gun owners who obtained their guns illegally(ingraham).