Comparison of Matisse and Kandinsky

734 Words3 Pages
In both Henri Matisse’s Le Bonheur de Vivre (The Joy of Life) and Vasily Kandinsky’s Sketch I for “Composition VII” the artists use similar techniques/styles in color, but use different techniques when it comes to brushstroke, line, and spacing. Both are outstanding works of art that reflect not only modernism but also the artistic movements that encompass them. They are also more different than alike. Matisse and Kandinsky both use a vibrant color pallet in their paintings, with rich primary colors, and some hints of other rich secondary (and a few tertiary) colors. The colors are used to show different forms and they draw the eye around the paintings. This is really the only thing these two paintings have in common. To contrast the paintings, the brushstrokes in both of these paintings are very different. Matisse’s brushstrokes are very fluid, predetermined, and linear. This is shown by how the lines contain the color and forms of the people and by how the trees are withheld to themselves, and how though the color is fluid inside the forms of the trees, the colors are still limited to the edge of the trees. This is contrasted in Kandinsky’s painting by how the brushstrokes are very random and spontaneous, not planned. This is shown by the spacing of objects and how much they overlap. Matisse is very consistent with his brushstrokes whereas Kandinsky switches between long and short brushstrokes, and thick and thin brushstrokes. Similar to brushstroke, the line in Matisse’s painting is very fluid and smooth and creates solid figures by the boundaries between colors. In Kandinsky’s painting the lines are very coarse and random. Also, the spacing in the paintings is very different. In Matisse’s painting, the placement of the people is well balanced and spaced out throughout the painting. In addition, though Matisse’s colors are very flat, he creates space through the

More about Comparison of Matisse and Kandinsky

Open Document