He wanted to establish a “dictatorship of the proletariat,” which means that the working class majority would rise to power over capitalist minority. Marx believed that this could be achieved by a revolution, and then a generous, benevolent dictatorship of the working class. Greatly differing from consecration, Marx’s ideas were solely from the word of man, such as ideas from Plato, earlier utopian societies of Robert Owen, Nathaniel Hawthorne, and smaller utopian experiments in the
Throughout history there have been bourgeois and proletarians, in ancient Rome patricians, knights, plebeians and slaves (57). Marx argues that “the immediate aim of the Communists is the same as that of all other proletarian parties: formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat" (67). He also considers the changes that by wanting to abolish private property, the Communist are seen as destroying the "ground work of all personal freedom, activity, and independence" (63). However, he explains how a laborer, proletarian, doesn’t properly own any property creating capitalism, a property which works in favor for the exploitation of the worker. Marx
The people in every county have the right to pick what is best for them as a county while keeping in mind that every citizen has a right to being safe and being treated with respect and dignity. Each government has its own platform, intentions and ideas about the roles that the people play in shaping that government. A national socialist government is one that was mainly shaped by Hitler and the Nazi government in the 1930 Germany. It is placed on the far right of the political spectrum and believes in libertarianism. They believe in having a lot of laws and taxes in order to give the government a lot of power over citizens.
One theorist said about how the state is just armed bodies of men and coercion is the only option Another type of state which makes coercion an essential part is the collectivised state. This is when the economy is completely state controlled and there is no private enterprise. There would be the collectivisation of agriculture and it would be centrally planned. This follows socialism and Marxism and an example would be USSR from 1917 to 1993. Finally, there is a coercive view of the state.
On the other hand, these two supreme leaders had ideological differences, which were used during the time, when they were in power. We can say that Lenin was more a political theorist and ideologue, and believed in socialism as the only way to save the working class from bourgeoisie usage, they wanted that there be only one equal class. However, Stalin presented his socialism not only as being pure as Lenin, but as also the only acceptable variant of socialism. His ideology served an ulterior purpose of reinforcing his legitimacy and authority . Furthermore, “A Short Course” (book written by Stalin) was not just purely ideological work but a political justification as its last chapter dealt with the liquidation of his opponents.
This meant that the majority of Catholics in Italy now supported Mussolini too. The reason the elites were important was for the same reason, they gave Mussolini support. But this time, instead of from the religious sector, the support came from the industrialists, known as the Elites. They feared socialism and saw fascism as the best way to combat their enemies. They were able to do this because they had considerable influence over those who worked for them and could get them to vote for fascism instead of socialism.
Of course there are many similarities as well as differences between the various totalitarian regimes that were in power in the past; however it can generally be said that the six major resemblances include well elaborated ideologies, an organised single mass party, a system of terror as well as propaganda affecting the citizens, a centrally directed economy together with a weapons monopoly. These aspects are used the following to compare the regimes of the two most famous totalitarian dictators in history: Hitler and Mussolini. Looking at German National Socialism and Fascist Italy two extreme ideologies can be seen that any human being would deem unreasonable. However they were both well elaborated which is essential to a totalitarian regime, as mentioned before. And it is of no question that expansionism was a major key point for both leaders, Hitler and Mussolini but even if the countries are close to each other, they did not compete for the same land.
The rise of totalitarianism governments started before WWII, but after the Great Depression when fascism became an ideology of society. Socialist leaders told the people what they wanted to hear. These leaders not only took advantage of their powers, but became totalitarian dictators of communism and Nazism states. In 1933 Hitler became the dictator and ruler of Germany. Hitler was known for his totalitarian government, which referenced his act based on Darwism.
Anarchism on the other hand was powerful in countries like Spain, France, Russia, and Mexico in the early twentieth century. The main principle behind anarchism is the belief that political authority in all its forms, and especially in the form of the state is both evil and unnecessary. The literal meaning of anarchy is ‘without rule.’ The type of economy socialism believes in is where the people own and manage the resources of the society, whereas anarchism believes that people should govern themselves and therefore are free to group themselves to produce wealth. Both socialist and anarchists believed in equality for all individuals to attain general wellbeing of each individual, however the tackle of realizing the
The minor details do not matter. The importance lies in the fact that in a monarchy or dictatorship one person has the power in a society and all the rest serve only to obey him. Starkly different is More’s creation. His society is a true communist one and it could also be argued that it is also a democracy. Leaders are