Stalin and Trotsky Essay Stalin took over as the leader of the USSR in 1928, getting rid of all his rivals in the process. How far do you agree with this? Although, Trotsky appeared to have the upper hand over Stalin in terms of leadership and intellect, however in the end Stalin replaced Lenin as the leader of the USSR. This was not only due to Stalin’s strengths and politically cunning mind but also due to Trotsky’s own mistakes and Stalin’s use of circumstances to his advantage. It can be said that it seemed unlikely for Stalin to succeed Lenin as he was considered dull and humourless by other communists.
Gandhi brought civil disobedience and other methods of peaceful protest to the world and earn limited independence for India. Gandhi proved to best leader of the three because he was able to achieve his goals with solutions that satisfied the people and made great change for the world. Stalin came to power in the USSR in 1928 and planned to create a new kind of society, made up of only socialist men and women. He wanted to build a strong army and a powerful industrial economy. Stalin ruled as a dictator and anyone who spoke out against him was subject to punishment as harsh as death.
What the other members of the soviet party such as Trotsky did not realize however; was that Stalin would use the position to gain a mass of followers for his socialist ideals and would use it as a stepping stone to achieve greater political influence and manipulate his way even further in the ranks. He had gained so much power and influence that in 1922 Lenin had asked for his removal from the party as he had “gained too much power”, he would advise his party this in a document that is now called “Lenin’s Last testament” a document that has a numerous amount of varying theories into its actual creation, either way the testament was for the most part underplayed and Stalin manipulated the party rules and the people in the party to for the most part ignore the document; much to Trotsky’s disappointment. After Lenin’s death in 1924 Stalin would not hesitate to preach his socialist ideals, which would be successful as the government did not choose to open up it’s meetings to the public in order to appear “healthy and stable”. By wanting to appear stable the party made it relatively simple for Stalin to use threats and targeted attacks to crush
With Trotsky being on the extreme left and Bukharin on the extreme right an alliance between them was unthinkable, which created a struggle for power. Trotsky argued that the NEP was economically and ideologically misguided while Bukharin supported the NEP. Bukharin believed in socialism in one country while Trotsky believed that no socialist society could exist alone. Trotsky and Bukharin had the most authority while Kamenev and Zinovev lost their authority while changing their positions from the extreme right to the extreme left. Ideology was crucial to the alliances that formed following Lenin’s death.
Although they agreed to work for democracy, but they have different interpretation of democratic. USSR believe democratic government should be a communist one, as communists truly represent the people; but USA think it should involve different political parties competing to win people's support in free election. Disagreement had change their relations. The success of this conference were mainly based on Stalin's relation with Roosevelt, but the situation in the next conference change when Roosevelt died and Truman became the new USA president. Their relations were worsen during Potsdam conference.
In comparing Marx and Weber there are some fundamental differences that have to be explored. While Marx took a historic approach and considered communism to be next in the line of a shifting of power, Weber saw the necessary social order springing out of traditional scripture and values. In similar contrast, while Marx thought of government springing up from the people, Weber saw it as a separate class
During the beginning of the 1900s, there were plenty of revolutions and violence that took place. The Chinese revolution in 1911 and Russian Revolution in 1917 shared similar goals, they wanted to end the power of their current leader and establish a new one. For Russia, it was Tsar Nicholas II and for China it was the Qing Dynasty, Russia wanting a functioning communist government and Chinese revolutionaries wanted a democratic government. The first outcome is different in that China relied on agriculture to maintain its economy and Russia relied on industry to fuel its economy. The second outcome of the revolutions was that the countries were dramatically changed, two great powers were stopped and communist leaders eventually took over in the two countries.
The main reasons are Ideology, which is the way people believe we should live and Protection, sometimes called security. In a nutshell, there were two belief systems, Communism and Capitalism which thought the other method was wrong. Also, in the 20th Century Communist USSR had been invaded twice from Western Europe and they wanted to make sure that it would not happen again. USA and USSR fought together in WWII because they both needed to defeat the common enemy, Nazi Germany. Even then they didn’t trust each other; USA and UK had even tried to defeat the Communists after the Russian Revolution and that hadn’t been forgotten by the USSR.
There can be no ignoring the effect that World War I had on Russia, with the crippling affects of a major war and the resulting breakdown of infrastructure within the Russian Empire. From 1903 when the Bolsheviks were formed a rising threat had emerged to Tsardom, The Marxist intellectual Vladimir Lenin was emerging as an influential light in the revolutionary movement. His earlier pamphlet entitled ‘What is to be done?’ outlined his need for more organisation, discipline, and leadership within the socialist parties. His idea of having a tight-knit exclusive organisation of professional revolutionaries showed he had the coherent theories to be a real threat to Tsarism. According to Alan Wood, Lenin described the 1905 revolution as a ‘dress rehearsal’.
 Stalinism usually defines the style of a government rather than an ideology. The ideology was "Marxist–Leninist theory", reflecting that Stalin himself was not a theoretician, in contrast to Marx and Lenin, and prided himself on maintaining the legacy of Lenin as a founding father for the Soviet Union and the future Communist world. Stalinism is an interpretation of their ideas, and a certain political regime claiming to apply those ideas in ways fitting the changing needs of society, as with the transition from "socialism at a snail's pace" in the mid-twenties to the rapid industrialisation of the Five-Year Plans. Sometimes, although rarely, the compound terms "Marxism–Leninism–Stalinism" (used by the Brazilian MR-8), or teachings of Marx/Engels/Lenin/Stalin, are used to show the alleged heritage and succession. arxism is an economic and socio-political worldview that contains within it a political ideology for how to change and improve society by implementing socialism.