Commentary: Clara The Clairvoyant

799 Words4 Pages
The title of the passage (chapter) seems to me very interesting. It is clearly stated that Clara is a clairvoyant, meaning having a supernatural ability to perceive events in the future or beyond normal sensory contact. In the chapters preceding this passage, we come across a lot of examples of magical realism as a theme in the novel, be it Rosa’s immense beauty, her plain white skin, her green hair or her yellow eyes, it all sounded too magical to be true. In the same context, Clara’s being a clairvoyant made me question the name of the chapter itself. Can she really possess such powers? Or is it just symbolic for some intuition that she has further in the book? The author has put the readers into a great dilemma through this title. The author has used simple language but complex sentences throughout the text. Some complex words have been used in the context of medical terms when Clara is being checked by the doctors. The events have been narrated in an omniscient, third person narrative. This style of narration is effective in portraying the story from the view of an outsider or someone other than the characters in the novel. However, this way of narration restricts itself in respect to knowing what a character s actually thinking. A first person narrative, which is also seen in this novel, is very effective in describing the story from the point of view of a certain character in the novel. Clara does not need to make any radical breaks with tradition to be an exceedingly independent woman. Her refusal to speak, although at first motivated by fear of the power of her words, is her first great gesture of self-assertion. Since traditionally women are meant to submit their opinions and their voices to those of men, this could be seen as a subservient gesture. However, as the Rumanian Rostipov explains, Clara does not talk because she does not want to. When Clara

More about Commentary: Clara The Clairvoyant

Open Document