[animal-testing.procon.org] Researchers in Aston University have made it known that it is not worth taking the lives of these animals for testing, because the things we’re trying to make happen with human bodies is very different from the animal body. The anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between animals and people make animals poor models for human beings. There is a big percentage from the 1950’s up till now that animal testing is flawed by not being correct when it is given to the people it is for. So why not just stop the animal experiments that are not just killing, but also torturing the animals.
If some countries have come up with the idea to take care of animals and have made even groups and organizations against animal abuse why do, they inhumanly abuse animals for testing. Experimental tests on animals its something unessential, and what if results are erroneous and in animals works perfect and on human results badly. As well, we know that the human body its pretty similar to an animal's body. Some doctors say that animal testing can slow down he results for a research or for a product. Some years ago, they inferred that animal testing cannot speculate how high the risk can be of a product or drug on
Those who against animal experiments insist that those painful experimentation on animals should be halted. The pain is not moral whether it is experienced by a child, an adult, or an animal. If it is wrong to impose pain on a human being, it is also wrong on an animal. But many people argue that halting animal experiments would end the progress of science and actually human are taking gain from those experiments. Animal experiments should be acceptable if the pain is minimized in all experiments.
In conclusion, animal testing should be eliminated because it violates animals’ rights, causing pain and suffering to the experimental animals. Humans must not justify making life better for themselves by randomly torturing and executing thousands of animals per
According to the Christian Medical Files book, ‘Animal Welfare’: “All experiments should be designed so that they are capable of giving useful results. If this has not happened the experiment is neither scientifically or morally acceptable.” If not all of the experiments will give scientists clear results, then many might see this as a waste of time and not a sufficient excuse to put animals through the pain of animal testing. In addition, there are many people who believe that there are so many animals involved and harmed in the process that the benefits to humanity are not justified. The BBC reveals that: “2.8 million procedures using animals were recorded in 2003,” (www.bbc.co.uk) There are evidently a large number of animals tested on, and many feel that this figure is far too high. After all, if the number of human beings that are benefiting is significantly smaller than the number of animals being harmed, surely the action of animal testing becomes morally wrong?
The Dangers of De-extinction Scientists continuously make progresses in the technological, environmental, medical, and genetic world. One topic related to genetic manipulation has currently been a hot debate amongst scientists and public alike as it involves using the past with the modern world’s technology to create a better future. It now appears that it is possible to create living species that have gone extinct using biotechnology and DNA samples from the ancient past. This process is called “de-extinction”. Conservationists, geneticists, and biotechnologists support this idea because of the technological and scientific challenges involved.
Animals should not be used for scientific experimentation Using Animals for scientific experimentation is in-humane, this act will decrease the amount of animal population, and therefore animals should not be used for scientific experimentation. Animals should not be used for scientific experimentation for they are living things, this indicates that they have feelings to. Also, animals are not a direct replica of humans, indicating that while medicines or antidotes for specific disease that may cure animals, this result does not mean that it will work successfully on humans. Furthermore, animals should not be used for scientific experimentation because animals deserve freedom just like humans. They live not to be used by scientists for experimentation, but to stabilize the ecosystem.
Also the way that the animals react to the stress of the experiments can severely affect the end results, rendering the experiments meaningless. Although it is true that we need animals to test our medical drugs on because if we didn’t, with modern day technology we wouldn’t be able to find cures for major diseases. But that doesn’t mean we should treat them so
However, most contemporary psychologists feel both have an effect on us. Have you ever wondered if you fear something because it is natural for humans to fear it or do you fear it because society has taught you that you should fear it? Have you ever wondered why you may have the same attitude as a family member, is it because of genetics or the fact that you have grown up with this person in your life? Many questions like these have forced us to wonder what the real cause of all of this is. Nature Nature, this is the biology of the person, the genetics.
Lamarck and Darwin’s Theories of Evolution Darwin, after studying species of animals, realised that animals or plants from the same species are show variation. He also thought that there are too many of a species to survive as they are all in competition for food and space. Some animals in a population were better suited to survive than others and it is these that would breed and pass on their features to the next generation. This natural selection could make a species change over time. Darwin had explained how evolution could happen.