Case Study: Does Partisan Control Make A Difference In Governmental Control

553 Words3 Pages
4/13,20 Chapter 6: Does Partisan Control make a difference in governmental control? First Studies started in 60’s and 70’s State economic status determines spending on governmental action, more so than political party intervention. Parties split over topics of: Welfare, Social Life, etc. (Health, Education, and Military) But no real influence Governor party affiliation affects spending in education Changes in SES affect governmental services, highly urbanized states increased spending on health and corrections, equals increase debt. W/ modest increases in education and state employment Higher Population = Increase Debt Spending on welfare and health care spending showed no change in relation to Party affiliation Aid to Family with Dependent Children evolves into Temporary Aid to Needy…show more content…
Republican vs. Democrat Studies show at the national level there is a difference on spending and taxing between parties, democrats generally spend more, republicans save more. States level party control does not make a significant difference between parties and policy instead policy differences are based on economic difference among the states. Dawson and Robinson in 1963 published a paper, Thomas dye in 1966, Lewis and beck in 1977, and hwang and grey in 91 A study in 1985, by James gerent, focused on spending priorities between 45-68 in American states, showed that no short term impact occurs but it does have a long term effect. Partisanship might have little impact on overall state spending; it does have an impact on specific areas especially those that are redistributable. For example: Welfare More partisan competition you have the broader the appeal for voter support. So that one party will advocate redistributive

More about Case Study: Does Partisan Control Make A Difference In Governmental Control

Open Document