Ana Vs. Jal Maintenance Strategy

5535 Words23 Pages
Running head: MAINTENANCE STRATEGY - JAL VS. ANA Maintenance Strategy Japan Airlines versus All Nippon Airways Hiroki Sayama Report Distributed February 6, 2008 Abstract The Japan Airlines Co. Ltd. (JAL), the Japan’s national flag carrier and one of the airline giants in the world, is continuously suffering a financial loss. Following a series of safety problems and reported management infighting tarnished the firm’s image and JAL is losing public trust. JAL has yet recovered flagship pride since the flight 123 catastrophic accident* experienced in 1985. On the other hand, the All Nippon Airways, Co., Ltd. (ANA), second place rival competitor keeps their operation in top shape even if the industry is shaken by sky high soaring fuel price. Supported by strong financial backbone, ANA ordered more than 120 airplanes to Boeing in last three years to replace existing and aging airplanes. In 2004, ANA proudly announced an introduction of Boeing 787 airplane into their core fleet structure and became the first oversea launch customer to Boeing. Although business plan and strategy varies and diverse in various fields, this report focuses on JAL and ANA’s maintenance strategy and compares carrier’s organization structure, outsourcing policy and fleet planning to evaluate how these companies maintain airplane safety and airworthy . In addition, the Appendix A supplements Japan’s current competition in transportation industry and the Appendix B provides background of JAL Flight 123 accident. *Note: The JAL Flight 123 crashed into the ridge of the Mt. Osutaka in Gumma Prefecture about 40 minutes after takeoff; resulting 520 deaths, including all 15 crew members. There were only 4 passengers survived and the accident remains the deadliest aviation disaster in history (See Appendix B). TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRUCT ii I. INTRODUCTION

More about Ana Vs. Jal Maintenance Strategy

Open Document