9/11 Conspiracy Theory It is common for any human to want answers. Not everyone can just accept what has happened without there being more behind the story. This is the same for everything that had happened on September 11, 2001. Not everyone can accept that four planes were hijacked without any involvement from the government. It may be distrust of the government or it really is just the human mind wanting answers.
Well the answer to this questions is no. According to CNN, “The CIA had quite a bit of information about two of the hijackers and their presence in the United States before 9/11,” and their threat reports was shared with Bush administration official but even after multiple warnings, the Bush administration was not able to respond to these threats appropriately (Bergen P). Even though it is clear that NSA spying would not resolve in the prevention of such a detrimental terrorist attack, it is still their reason on continuing the program. The NSA also did not prevent the Boston bombing on April 15, 2013, which killed three people and wounded more than 260 people (Levitz J). The NSA spends around $2 billion each year but the results that the government is getting is not quite promising (Sahadi J).
Japanese planes were spotted by radar before the attack, but they were assumed to be a flight of American B-17s due in from the West Coast. The day after the assault, President Franklin D. Roosevelt asked Congress to declare war on Japan. Congress approved his declaration with just one dissenting vote. It was a calm normal day on September 11, 2001 when two commercial jets flew into the World Trade Center’s Twin Towers. 19 Al-Qaeda terrorists hijacked four commercial passenger jet airliners.
Williams, conveys conflicting perspectives about the September 11 attack by terrorists on the Pentagon. The slideshow depicts the 9/11 attacks on the United States America building pentagon. The slideshow starts of with a few known facts “ 9.38am....American Airlines flight 77...flew into the Pentagon”. It then goes to the perspective of who could see the damage “hole in pentagon and no Boeing 757” and a image in the background with arrows pointing to undamaged spools of wire and windows intact after the impact which someone would consider not normal if a plane crashes into a building. Providing a numerous amounts of eye witness accounts of the crash Williams deliberately builds the argument that there is a possibility that it was not a plane
There are many statements and arguments that suggest that the nuclear bomb dropped on Hiroshima was necessary to end World War II. Such as the Japanese were not surrendering, they still had fighting power as they had sunk U.S. Naval Ship Indianapolis only two days before the bombing Many of this argument can be counted as the only reason the Japanese weren’t surrendering is because they didn’t want to give up there emperor to the “unconditional surrender”, they practically had nothing left. They were sending their battleships and pilots out on suicide missions as they were desperate. Necessity of the bomb lies with the amount of people that would have been killed in a land invasion, although it was vastly exaggerated.
War now does not allow any civillian casualites. Also now with the modern technology exaples like advanced radar, heat seeking missiles, more accurate bombing technology and more advanced aircraft, it is impossible to miss a target. Back in WW2 they bombed industrial areas because it was really hard to bomb a certain spot where the enemy army would be. I do not think it was acceptable back than because why kill millions of civillians when you can go directly to the source which was the military attacking? This is a really hard argument because if you attack the enemy army which is attacking you, you have to think about the deaths of your own men.
Armed Pilots 1 A LOOK AT THE ARGUMENT OF ARMING PILOTS A look at the argument of arming airline pilots D M Aeronautical Science for Management AGMT 202 Arming Pilots 2 ABSTRACT: This paper gives both sides to the argument about pilots carrying guns in the cockpits. While on the one hand the pilots would be able to protect themselves and their passengers if they carried guns, on the other hand there are those pilots that have never had gun training and do not care to handle guns. When they became pilots they did not take into consideration that they might have to become 'soldiers of the air' as well. Armed pilots 3 A look at the argument of arming airline pilots On the subject of airline safety, I feel that the consideration of guns being carried by pilots is astoundingly important. There has been much controversy as to whether pilots should be allowed to carry guns in the cockpit.
No food or bottled water is allowed through security. Passengers are selected at random for more intense screenings.” (Wood) In addition, over the years since 9/11, airport security has tried to come up with new, drastic changes, such as new equipment and procedures and in some ways it has impacted many Americans. Furthermore, there is also an impact on the physical and psychological
It was a hard decision to order to destroy the American bombers but President did not have any choice. After the fighters did not succeed to shut down Group Six and they went down in to the sea, President called Mr. Chairman to notify him of the existed problem. The Security Dilemma is created on both sides because when the bombers step on the Russian
1994 conclude that the real causes of this disaster were weak locks of the door and the stray signals produced by some pair of wires which made the opened itself without any command. This article is useful for my research since I can use it to discuss possible causes and consequences to the accident of United Airlines Boeing 747 Hawaii (1989). Word count: 105 words Source 3 Aircraft Accident Report, United Airlines Flight 811, Boeing 747-122, N4713U, Honolulu, Hawaii February