4-Mat Review Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity

1426 Words6 Pages
Review of David N. Entwistle’s Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity Cynthia Warren Liberty University Review of David N. Entwistle’s Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity Summary Entwistle’s goal of this book is to inform the reader that there are two different books of God: His word and His works (Enwistle, 2010, p. 26). The Bible states, Jesus and His disciples used integration to perform God’s work. As in 2 Timothy 3:16: All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness. The book is filled with information that provides an explanation of the relationship between psychology (God’s works) and theology (God’s words). He uses the ancient cities of Athens and Jerusalem to show how the cultural differences between the two are used to display the theme of integration. The comparison between the two cities backs his argument that “all truth is God’s truth, so wherever and however truth is discovered, its author is God (p. 13). One of Entwistle’s main focuses is that “A well-thought-out Christian worldview is a precondition for effective integration” (p. 63). A majority of the book concentrates on the theory of worldviews. He defines worldview as “a set of presuppositions, which we hold about the basic make-up of the world” (p. 56). Throughout the book, Entwistle stands by the reasoning that a Christian worldview is the key to effective integration. For most people, if they do not know where something came from, they will not be able to predict its future. In theory, this is what Entwistle was explaining in the earlier part of the book by covering the history of psychology, theology beliefs, and how the two can work together. As the reader becomes familiar with the similarities and differences between psychology and
Open Document