Classical And Operant Conditioning

1672 Words7 Pages
Classical and Operant Conditioning: Phobias and Addictions Classical and Operant Conditioning: Phobias and Addiction Where do phobias and addictions originate? Is it possible that we teach ourselves to fear frogs, enclosed places, clowns, or heights? How about addictions? Can addicts learn to abuse substances through operant conditioning? The answer is yes. With conditioning, a form of learning, humans and animals either associate elements of their environment with other aspects of their environment; or they learn through consequence of their environment. In a majority of all the behaviors that we demonstrate a form of conditioning, classical or operant, is used to learn and continue to act out these behavior. Phobias and addictions are two emotional difficulties, which theorist can account as the result of classical and operant learning. Phobias are learned through elements of classical conditioning, and addictions can be learned and strengthened through elements of operant conditioning. Distinguishing between Classical and Operant Conditioning Classical conditioning, the first type of learning to be systematically studied, is defined as a procedure by which a previously neutral stimulus come to elicit a response after it is paired with a stimulus that automatically elicits that response (Kowalski, 2009). Ivan Pavlov, a Russian physiologist, documented and developed the concept of classical conditioning in an experiment he conducted in which he conditioned dogs to salivate at the sound of a bell. In classical conditioning, a neutral stimulus, a bell, is paired with a stimulus, dog food. The dog food is a stimulus that produces a response naturally. If a dog sees food it knows to eat, eating food is an unconditioned reflex. This make the dog food an unconditioned stimulus, a stimulus the produces the response in an unconditioned reflex
Open Document