Can 'learning' Explain Phobias Of Creepy Crawlies?

1177 Words5 Pages
“Learning can be defined as the process leading to relatively permanent behavioural change or potential behavioural change. In other words, as we learn, we alter the way we perceive our environment, the way we interpret the incoming stimuli, and therefore the way we interact, or behave”. (Heffner, 2001) Individuals can learn in many different ways. One of the learning theories is called Classical Conditioning. This theory works through stimuli and responses. Psychologists also use Observational Learning when analysing the causes behind phobias. This essay will explain the differences between both these learning theories then go on to discuss whether or not either of them can explain phobias about snakes or creepy crawlies. Behaviourism is plays a major role in the school of thought within psychology. It believes that learning occurs through interaction with the environment and that it is the environment that shapes behaviour instead of through thoughts, feelings and emotions. A well-known aspect of behavioural learning is Classical Conditioning. This theory was first discovered by Russian Physiologist Ivan Pavlov. Classical Conditioning is a learning process which occurs through associations between a stimulus and a response. In order to understand the theory, we must familiarise ourselves with the basic principles. (Martin, Carlson, Buskist, page 259). The unconditional stimulus is something that creates a natural and automatic reaction, like reflexive behaviour. For example, if you smell your favourite food cooking, you will automatically feel hungry. In this example, the smell of food is the unconditional stimulus. (Cherry, 2010) The unconditional response is something that isn’t learned, it just happens naturally and automatically in response to the unconditioned stimulus. In my example, the unconditioned response is the feeling of hunger.
Open Document