Dropout rates and other violent crimes may contribute from continuous suspension and expulsion. “Just imagine if a student just committed a crime for example, doing graffiti on the lockers. Then the student is sent to the principal tells the student that their suspended. The student will now feel very sad and happy at the same time because they just got suspended. This can ruin his life and at the same time, the students could dropout from school and do whatever they like.”(Dale) When students get expelled from schools, there would be no hope for them and they would no longer care about their education and their future goals.
School violence in all is harmful forms that has potentially serious short and long term affects on the individual student, the school as a whole, and the society. If students are in uniforms it can prevent robberies for their brand name clothing and shoes. The consequences for not being in uniforms are students could get shot at for having on the wrong colors, gang wars can start. “Parents are happy to have something worn that can’t be mistaken for gang attire.” (Myers, R. A. 1995, Sep 15) Uniforms can stop the haves
Case Analysis EDU/315 – Legal & Ethical Issues in Education 06/04/2012 Teaching is no longer an aspect of impacting knowledge on students. Today, however, teachers are not only expected to tutor but also to be the guardian as for the students. Teaching upholds both legal and ethical expectations for teachers. Imagine a fifth grade teacher who during exams suspects one of the students of cheating- this she concludes after she observes the student looking across the aisle at another students paper. The teacher goes over to the student, tears the exam paper in two, and dumps it in the dustbin.
Some (mainly parents) may oppose to this proposition as it may be an awkward environment where students are trying to learn but are feared by the knowledge that the very person standing in front of them teaching, is armed with a dangerous weapon. And who is to say the teachers themselves would not commit a crime? Not every person in the world is “good” and it’s not always the students that are to blame. There have been records of teachers that were unable to teach because of their emotional instability or mental illness. Knowing this, any teacher could pull off a well-devised plan to wipe out everyone simply because no one would have suspected them.
An example of the previously stated assertion is in the Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier case. A school principal censored a student newspaper by removing some of the articles prior to publication because he felt the some of the student’s body would feel uncomfortable and targeted by the topics. The students felt that the principal’s actions were unfair and violated their first amendment rights of freedom of speech and press. They took the case to court, and the decision was 5 to 3 with one jurier undecided in favor or the school district. This case shows how even though the students have freedom of speech and press if it will impact the audience or others negatively it isn’t allowed.
Heilbroner then goes on to tell us that stereotyping is like gossip which makes us pre judge people before we get a chance to even meet them. Once we stereotype a person then we tend to see them in the manner in which we pre judged them. Heilbroner goes on to tell us about another study he did in a gym class in middle school. He told the "cool" kids to mess up on the exercises. When he asked the children who messed up on the exercise, they said the children who were considered "bad" were doing it wrong instead of identifying the "cool" kids as the children who did it wrong.
For there is no uniform academic definition for classroom disruptions yet, it might be assumed as any conduct that seriously interferes with the ability of the teacher to teach or the student’s ability to learn. But who decides if a student’s behavior can be regarded as disturbing? Some teachers may consider a student as disturbing while others wouldn’t even notice. Sleeping in class, inappropriate use of electronic devices or cell phones, entering class late or leaving early (without permission), making loud or distracting noises, disputing authority and arguing with faculty are examples of obvious disruptive behavior. The intensity of such classroom disruptions depends on the teacher’s reaction to them, though dealing with those disturbances may not be as important as the teacher’s accurate classroom management as an essential preventive measure.
Despite the disagreements, strict disciplinary actions need to be enforced in schools to avoid bullying; because, it disrupts the learning environment, causes future disadvantages, and makes the victims become emotionally unstable. To begin with, not having strict disciplinary actions enforced in schools causes bullying to disrupt the learning environment. For example, victims of bullying find it impossible to concentrate in class while their bully is distracting them: This shows that not having strict disciplinary actions enforced in school could make many victims of bullying adapt school phobia. Additionally, fights in school that both the bully, and victim engages in diverts both of them from their learning process; this demonstrates, not having strict disciplinary actions in school is not only disruptive, but also dangerous. Lastly, constant fights, suspensions, or lack of the ability to cooperate in school with other students, makes it hard for bullies to apply for other schools due to their behavioral issues.
The behavior by bullies then is virtually encouraged as students become afraid or feel that the administration will not react appropriately should they inform them of a bulling situation. Students at this age will make mistakes and react inappropriately occasionally in response to a bullying situation if they feel there is no help from the school. Clearly each incident needs to be investigated and any punishment should be appropriate based on the circumstances involved. It is clear the principles only goal in dealing with behavior issues in the school is to indentify, isolate, intimidate, and remove. This simply will not work if no effort is made to correctly indentify were and with who the problem started.
If probation will not change a delinquent student’s behavior, the Student Judicial Court will need to expel these boys from the school. I think the members who have an aggressive behavior in Athletes Club a are really big problem and it is very important to resolve this problem for people around them because they hinder other students to activity in groups. If the boys are given