Language Development in Children

692 Words3 Pages
Exploring language development in children – Chomsky versus Skinner a Nature versus nurture debate. Dean Jones. How children develop the ability to speak is the subject of many theories and much debate. There are behavioural theories which assume children acquire the ability to speak by imitating what they hear, conditioning and habit formation. Conversely there are nativist theories that believe that human beings have an intrinsic aptitude. Major arguments for and against both theories are provided by a behavioural psychololgist named Burrhus Frederic Skinner and a linguist by the name of Noam Chomsky. This essay aims to explore the theories of these two gentlemen, their proponents and supporting arguments. B.F Skinner and the behaviourist theory. Skinner as a behavioural psychologist believed that the study of observable behaviour is more productive that being concerned with the internal goings on of the mind. He held the belief the best way to understand behaviour was to observe the causes of an action and the associated consequences. He gave this approach the name operant conditioning (McLeod, 2007). In 1957, Skinner’s book Verbal Behaviour was published which introduced the notion that language is behaviour. In the book Skinner (1957; cited in Pavio & Begg 1981) identifies what he calls ‘Verbal Operants’ further broken down into Mands, tacts, ethoics, textuals and intraverbals. The mand is based on command and demand with the speaker using a mand primarily for his or her own interest. This can be further explained as a request for something which is results in it being produced. For example, if a child wants a drink , it knows from it’s past experience that if it says ‘drink’ it will likely get a drink. The drink becomes the reinforcer. Tacts refer to the child ability to identify objects and name them. The reinforcement in this case
Open Document