Top of Form Rubric for Grading Case Analysis AMBA 670 | Case Analysis Rubric | | | Total Points Possible | Grading Criteria | 90-100 | • Superior analysis: Identifies all or most of the key issues presented by the case. Discussion of issues reflects strong critical thinking and analytical skill. Discussion/analysis makes all or most of the recommendations called for by the case issues. Recommendations are supported by data from all or most of the relevant case facts and exhibits data. Data are creatively manipulated and applied.
Eng 096/Hum 105 – The Power of Stories Connected Knower Connected knowers seek to understand others' ideas and points of view, emphasizing the relevance of context in the development of knowledge and the fundamental value of personal experience or purpose. |Name | | |Date | | Claims – a substantial thought, idea, or point. 5 points _____ 1) List all the relevant items within each category. 2) List 2-3 claims for each item – can be a paraphrase, summary,
Describe the process by which you located the case that you think best explains IIED and its elements, including the terms you used in conducting your search, the number of results you found, whether and how you narrowed or expanded your search, and how you settled on the case you chose. Provide the citation for that case, using proper citation format. Second, using cases you located in your earlier search, or by performing further searches, find at least four (4) cases that you would rely upon to convince a court that, based upon the facts provided by Ott, he has a good claim for IIED. Explain why each of these four cases is useful in establishing Ott’s claim. To do so, examine Ott’s facts carefully, and locate cases with similar or comparable facts where IIED was an issue.
Has a clear topic sentence (2 points) 2. Has embedded evidence (3+ quotations) that prove your opinion (6 points, if each is well-chosen) 3. Has an explanation of how the evidence proves what you say in your topic sentence (6 points, if quotation is explained well) 4. Ideas well organized and transition well to one another (2 points) 5. Spelling, Grammar (2 points) Info6 – Determine an author’s point of view or purpose in a text in which the rhetoric is particularly effective, analyzing how style and content contribute to the power, persuasiveness, or beauty of a
Demonstrate understanding of the organization and basic features of print. a. Recognize the distinguishing features of a sentence (e.g., first word, capitalization, ending punctuation). Domain: Fluency Standard: 4. Read with sufficient accuracy and fluency to support comprehension.
UNI 110/Critical Reading & Thinking Critical Thinking Self-Assessment (Due: _____________) READ CAREFULLY: This assignment asks you to present an arguable opinion your current development as a critical thinker. Your goal is to convince the audience that your opinion is valid and worth considering: * What has influenced your critical thinking? * Who has served as a role model for you in terms of your critical thinking? * Which of the characteristics of a skilled critical thinker do you already possess? * How did you develop those characteristics?
2. Write a memo in which you explain your view of what her over-riding goal(s) should be and the rationale for your priorities, explain which tasks should be in which category (a, b, c above) and why, indicate how each item should be handled in as much detail as space allows; however, your memo should be no more than 600 words. Be sure to use correct spelling and grammar. Grading Criteria Possible Points Point of view Clear position taken on the main issues; framework provided; priorities explained 5 Clarity of specific recommendations; coherence and feasibility of recommendations 5 Consistency of goals and recommendations for action 5 Argumentation Arguments clear, well developed, logically coherent 5 Arguments well selected, persuasive for audience(s) 5 Structure Consistent, efficient, logical structure; persuasive structure for this audience 5 Good use of transitions 5 Good use of headings, white space, and other formatting devices 5 Each section developed in sufficient detail 5 Style and Tone Clarity, precision, and economy of style 5 Correctness, freedom from mechanical errors 5 Appropriateness of tone; tact; avoidance of self-serving or mixed messages 5 TOTAL 60 Ms. Gilchrest arrived at the helm of the Yellowtail Marine Inc. during the very trying times. She needs to stabilize the current situation before things get
The six steps are as follows: (1) framing the question, (2) finding sources of information, (3) assessing the accuracy of the evidence, (4) assessing the applicability of the evidence, (5) assessing the “actionability” of the evidence, and (6) determining if the information is adequate. (Rundall et al. 2008) Each step was equally important and valuable when making these
Teams can use the 4Rs Method to analyze the conflict logically, which will lead to finding an appropriate approach to solving issues at hand. After analyzing the problem teams can chose between several approaches, which include the A-E-I-O-U Model, negotiation, mediation, and arbitration. The A-E-I-O-U Model is based on specific steps that help group members reach a consensus decision. Furthermore, group members’ concerns are taken into consideration and understanding them is mandatory in finding a viable solution. The steps in the A-E-I-O-U Model include: a) assume that the other members mean well; b) express one’s feelings; c) identify what one would like to have happen; d) outcomes one expects are made clear; and e) understanding on a mutual basis is achieved.
Critical Thinking Application Ronnell B. Ramos MGT/350 Critical Thinking: Strategies in Decision Making December 8, 2011 William Slomski, MBA Critical Thinking Application Critical thinking is the process of thinking for ideas to reach the best solution to any given problem. Critical Thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action (Scriven and Paul). Part of using critical thinking is using credible sources for information along with good judgment then using analysis to process the information