"A Jury of Her Peers" Gender Analysis

1129 Words5 Pages
In 1916 Susan Glaspell wrote a one-act play titled “Trifles” for the Provincetown Players, and in 1927 she developed the story and her characters to produce her renowned short story “A Jury of Her Peers”. These works revolve around the theme of the gender roles in the 1900’s. In that time women were commonly seen as less than men; they couldn’t vote and like them their opinion and rights were irrelevant. The main characters of “A Jury of Her Peers” Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters represent women of the 1900’s—both women were the typical housewives who watched over children, cooked, and did farm chores. Though both women were ordinary they had their differences; Mrs. Hale was outspoken and feminist and Mrs. Peters is a delicate woman with little expression of opinion. These two women—contrary to their initial impression—evolve as characters and hold significance through pure common female knowledge, discovering the truth about what happened on the night of John Wright’s death, and proving themselves to be no less worthy or capable of being the jury than the men. Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters are two dynamic characters; they evolve from generic housewives without a voice in the conviction of Mrs. Wright to being the only true jury for their peer. The men in this story don’t play much of a role but they are used to express the stereotype of women. When Mr. Hale says “Oh well women are used to worrying over trifles” he sums up what the male population thought of women. Martha Hale the first character the audience encounters initially seems like a very practical and efficient wife and mother who “hated to see things half done”. As ordinary as she may seem one can also deduct that she is a smart woman, capable of seeing the bigger picture and when given the chance will stand up for her beliefs. This is apparent through the way Mrs. Hale assess’ the situation that pulled her away
Open Document