Why Do Some People Object to the Term 'Mental Illness'

2034 Words9 Pages
Why do some people object to the term ‘mental illness’? To understand the complexity of the term ‘mental illness’, it is necessary to explore a diverse range of perspectives on varying topics that often arise within the ‘world’ of mental health. Using the elements of the K225 course model as a basis for exploration, this essay shall aim to demonstrate a knowledge and understanding of the individual experiences that could lead to possible reasons why, some people may not be in favour of the term ‘mental illness’. (Unit 1, p.19). The ‘world’ of mental health briefly consists of people, services, policy, and legislation. For the individual involved in the ‘world’ of mental health their experiences of mental distress may vary in relation to the services they are part of, and what role they have within those services. The course model places the individual at the centre, with social, environmental, economic, and political influences surrounding them, and the wider factors of ethics and values surrounding these. These elements can influence each other, and all provide a framework to explore the meaning of mental distress for the individual. There have been many attempts at defining mental health or illness, each using different terminology depending on the perspectives. The definition by ‘The World Health Organisation’, reads, ‘Mental health is a state of wellbeing in which the individual realises his or her own abilities, can cope with normal stresses of life, can work productively and fruitfully and is able to make a contribution to his or her community’. (Unit 1, p.13). The term ‘mental illness’ might be used to describe a broad range of mental and emotional conditions, and in some definitions the term has been changed to ‘mental disorder’, ‘The Mental Health Act’ being one example of this. (Mental Health Act, 1983). One reason for this varying use of language

More about Why Do Some People Object to the Term 'Mental Illness'

Open Document