What Are The Causes Of Sectional Conflict

788 Words4 Pages
U.S. History to 1877 October 29, 2012 The Sectional Conflict The sectional conflict between the northern and southern Americans, during the 18th century, could not be resolved without considerable compromise from both sides. Factors such as an extension of territorial boundaries fueled the conflict owing to the slavery issue. This paper discusses the reasons why the sectional conflict was unavoidable, as well as the conflicts that arose between the northerners and southerners. Besides, the paper discusses the reasons why Lincoln and Douglas were always at loggerheads, and why they could not come up with a compromise. The rise of the West brought with it new grounds for sectional conflicts. These conflicts rose because of the way in which the issue of slavery was handled, in the new states. The northerners, unlike their southern counterparts, wanted the new states to be free from slavery. As a result, the conflict between…show more content…
While Lincoln thought that slavery was morally wrong, Douglas had no moral position on the issue. Douglas believed that “one of the reserved rights of the state was the right to regulate the relations between the master and servant” (Chas et al. 369). He further opposed Negro citizenship by suggesting that America consisted of the white people and should benefit them forever. On the other hand, Lincoln had a very different point of view. He supported free labor, where one works for another on a mutual agreement basis. According to Lincoln, all people were entitled to basic human rights despite the fact that he viewed African American to be inferior to the whites. The two rivals could not find a lasting compromise because of their political ambitions. The elected leaders determined the direction in which the issue of slavery took. The year 1860 marked the end of slavery when Abraham Lincoln won the presidential elections. (Chas et al.
Open Document