Many of them don’t currently have health insurance because of how expensive it is. I think it should be our right as free American citizens to gamble with our life or our finances if we don’t want to purchase health insurance. It’s not like they don’t understand the potential consequences of not having insurance and it’s a choice they should be allowed to make. With the prior stipulation of the word “qualifying” health insurance I am sure it is going to cost them a great deal of money that they probably can’t afford. If they choose to pay the tax than they are paying up to $2,100 that they could be spending on healthcare if something was to happen to them.
The democratic party made a new healthcare plan that makes health care affordable for all and if you can’t afford it then the government can most likely help you get it and this ties in well with the liberals view of the government helping the people stay protected but it also clashes with the conservatives point of view. The conservatives believe that health care should be bought independently and not helped by the funding of the government because they believe that the people need to be able to keep themselves afloat without the governments help with our daily
The majority of Americans don’t want invasive ultrasound bills, they do want the Bush era tax cuts to be eliminated, they do want affordable or even single payer healthcare. The reason that certain bills and laws are being pushed through against the will of the majority is money. Money from billionaires and corporations has more influence in this country than the voice of the people. There is supposed to be a system of checks and balances
Overall the one I choose on HealthCare.gov is a lot better than the one I have now. I disagree that we have to carry approval coverage or we’ll face a fine from the IRS. I believe if you don’t have coverage you shouldn’t be penalized for it. This is post to be a free country, and doing this I believe goes against that. Even though I do believe having health coverage is very smart.
The idea to tax it and make a profit will not work the way it is suppose to because of how easy it is to produce this drug yourself (unlike tobacco, and alcohol),and with people producing their own marijuana they will also be selling it cheaper than the government as well. Therefore taxing marijuana will not have a great profit. In the article “Exposing the myth of Medical Marijuana,” by The US Drug Administration website, it is said that the drug causes more health problems then it relieves, and also of it is really necessary you can ask your doctor, and get a
However, wealthy individuals can involve in the issue and try to assist these individuals. This approach can be a significant method to prevent us from paying higher taxes. Bykofsky also claims that the government should be the main provider to assist the homeless. He states that “If they want a job, but society is unable to provide a job, then government should provide money for food and shelter to be delivered through welfare or a workfare program” (Par 14). Bykofsky shows that homeless individuals are not lazy; they are willing to work; however, the society is not providing them with jobs.
They argue that introducing private health care will lessen the burden on the publicly funded system as many well off citizens would simply choose to pay out of pocket or through private insurers for services rather than rely on the public system. They argue that the government cannot do it efficiently. At zero prices there is an increase in demand for health care services. This in turn causes the introduction of expensive technology which increases health costs. With taxes at a breaking point government has little recourse but to try to hold down costs.
This will reduce regulations, when it comes to health care and save money for Americans. Romney wants fewer regulations. He believes the government shouldn’t have that much control over citizens in the United States. I believe that Obama had his chance to better America, and he just made it worse. Why should he get another chance?
This does not seem like a commonwealth mentality. There have even been talks about turning Puerto Rico into a socialist Island. Which, again this would further damage the countries plan of independence. Although, socialism may be the way to go to assist in Puerto Rico recovery towards a better future, this can also back fire since many people can be forced to have health care and pay taxes. The problem with unemployment is that no one is spending money and putting the money back into the economy.
I don’t know if it’s ethical to require someone to have health insurance, however, I think it is admirable to want every American to have health insurance. My only concern is that there will be bias decisions based on the type of coverage that you have just like it is today. Majority of Americans can afford to pay for the best insurance plan .Whereas the rich will be able to pay the best coverage therefore leaving the person with low income the inability to get the best coverage available.” The national health system reform law is expected to reduce the nation's uninsured population to what could be an all-time low. But even after the major reforms take effect starting in 2014, millions will remain without coverage, whether by choice or