Lords and Daimyo (basically the same status) built castles for protection, and both the Knights and Samurai were depended on for military service by great landowners. Feudalism in Europe lasted from 800 to 1400, while in Japan it started in 1192 and lasted till 1868. . The codes of honor for both Knights and Samurai are different in that breaking these codes have severely different outcomes, though ethically, both codes of honor are very similar. Both the Samurai and the Knights have a duty to remain loyal to their leaders and keep peace within their respective nations. A Knight’s loyalty to his leader was generally based on a legal contract rather than moral obligation, like a Samurai has.
DBQ Essay Bryan Orozco 9-11-14 4th period There are plenty types of warriors but for now I’m only going to write about samurais and knights. They both are sworn to oaths to the lord to protect their city. Loyalty towards the feudal lord in Japan was hereditary. The samurai’s life didn’t belong to himself but to the lord. At all times must they follow the kings and lords commands and If not followed then there are greatly dishonored.
The idea of feudalism is associated with the idea of decentralized power. In these early ages there was little to no government present in Japan and Europe. People fell into classes in order to make the kingdom survive; however it was not an organized system. Feudalism was somewhat of an unknown idea, however this idea help shape Japan and Europe into becoming centralized. Japanese and European feudalism have many similarities as well as differences.
These rigorous warriors had to firmly conform to their masters to directly demonstrated respect to those above them in the social class, and they had to follow the bushido code, which was a unique Japanese code of conduct that was created in the 1600s. The bushido code worked impeccably well during war periods, but since the Tokugawa shogunate brought over two hundred years of peace and unity among Japan, the role of the bushido code drastically changed the samurai’s violent existence into one of civility, wisdom, and tranquility. With the warrior class suffering the most during an era of peace, Musui’s story contradicts the relationship between samurai ideals and actual samurai life with the personal account of Katsu Kokichi, who lived a life unworthy of the samurai ways during the Edo period. Kokichi, who officially took the name of Musui after his retirement, lived an adventurous life that can very well highlight the differences between a samurai of the Tokugawa period with one of earlier existence. Through a time of peace, samurai could hardly benefit in terms of finances and security since they were not needed as direly as during times of war.
The general of the Minamoto, became the head man of the Samurais, very much like the knights they swore to protect their people. From roughly 1000-1600 CE the Samurais were trained to be warriors to defend Japan, and the Knights were trained warriors to defend Europe. They were different, but they were more alike than different, because of their Class Systems and loyalty, their armor and military training, and their Honor and views of death. Both the Samurais and the Knights were similar in their Class Systems and loyalty. They were both part of the Feudal System (Doc A).
Everything depends upon it, the present and the future. Above all we must secure unity: we must be able to cast a whole generation in the same mould.” By doing this, Napoleon was decreasing the gap between the Nobles and the Peasants. He was trying to make a middle class, so that everyone with power and authority had deserved it, and weren’t just with power because their parents had connections,
Characteristics of a perfect knight * The Duty, honor, loyalty and the willingness to shed blood and have their own shed filled the life of a medieval knight. * It was no easy task and many a man was cut down before his prime in the pursuit to become a knight in medieval times. * It was terribly expensive to be a knight. * Becoming a knight was part of the feudal agreement. * In the late middle ages, many prospective knights began to pay "shield money" to their lord so that they wouldn't have to serve in the king’s
These were dictated by ‘the Knightly code’, with the Knight being compelled to "protect the weak, defenceless, and helpless, and fight for the general welfare of all’. Although this code was rarely lived up to, it remained the standard for chivalry and proper behaviour amongst the nobility for centuries. In non-military terms, the code meant that Knights had a code of ethics that dictated how they acted off the battlefield. As the Medieval period progressed, the culture changed becoming ‘more refined and elegant’. Knights were expected to understand the rules of Chivalry and courtly love.
The noble class consisted of government and military leaders, high level priests and lords (tecuhtli). The macehualtin (commoner) class included farmers, artisans, and merchants; individuals who farmed and paid taxes to support the uppers classes in their society. The serfs (slaves) worked the land owned by nobles. On the contrary, the Inca, unlike the Aztecs, did not make slaves from prisoners of war. Their discussion did result in a smaller military and less cultural diversity society, but their population of natives did however remain faithful to their ethnic and cultural values.
The men who leased land from the King were known as Barons; they were wealthy, powerful and had complete control of the land they leased from the King. Barons leased land from the King which was known as a manor. They were known as the Lord of the Manor and were in complete control of this land. They established their own system of justice, minted their own money and set their own taxes. In return for the land they had been given by the King, the Barons had to serve on the royal council, pay rent and provide the King with Knights for military service when he demanded it.