Warriors vs. Samurai's

624 Words3 Pages
DBQ Essay Bryan Orozco 9-11-14 4th period There are plenty types of warriors but for now I’m only going to write about samurais and knights. They both are sworn to oaths to the lord to protect their city. Loyalty towards the feudal lord in Japan was hereditary. The samurai’s life didn’t belong to himself but to the lord. At all times must they follow the kings and lords commands and If not followed then there are greatly dishonored. Knights and samurais were more similar than different in three broad areas: social position, training and armor, honor and death. Both warriors honorably fought for their lords when Japans and Europe’s need them the most. So it’s time to find out if the similarities are really greater than the differences! Back in medieval days they used social class pyramids every day. They used the Social pyramids to show how societies were structured. From day one when you’re born, your automatically put into a class. Whatever your family was ranked is usually your rank, the higher up you are the more power you have. Knights and Samurai were more towards the bottom of the period. Knights were ranked fifth and Samurai were ranked fourth. Both could gain land for protecting their lord, if they gained enough land to take over they could also gain more power. Since both were meant to fight, Knights and Samurai had similar armor. Samurai were Japanese warriors and in Japan a lot of things that were needed were made from bamboo or nature. On the other side Knights were in Europe and used iron. Although both were different their armors for battle were very similar. Both suits of armor are similar to each other, Knights wore chain metal all over and Samurai wore leather and bamboo. Samurai didn’t wear their armor all over because the right arm was used for shooting bows. The one bad thing about Samurai is if it were raining or their suit

More about Warriors vs. Samurai's

Open Document