Smith (2006) defines victim compensation as a “form of income redistribution designed to redistribute wealth from offenders to victims of crime” (307). The key distinction in this form of victim compensation is that these individuals are being compensated for the impacts of criminal acts that were deliberately perpetrated against them by someone who was subsequently tried and convicted for those acts. Often there is a time window within which a victim is required to file for compensation (Siegel, 2005). Often, extensions can be granted if there are justifications for filing late. In
By trying to figure out the total amount, this must include a proposed increase or decrease in tax (including penalties), or claimed refund. If you are making an offer in compromise, include total unpaid tax, penalty, and interest due. In order for the small case to be requested, my client and I will have to send a letter about requesting Appeals consideration, indicating the changes he/she do not agree with, and indicating the reasons why he/she do not agree. 3. Predict counter argument that the IRS could use to validate its position.
The prosecutor must maintain his or her case with holding the defendant accountable, decreasing the time span and funds spent in a trial, and making certain the victim is reimbursed financially, and helped to be made whole again. One vital deliberation for the prosecutor is the predisposition for a lack of assistance from the victim. This can negatively disturb the prosecution's case. This is exceptionally genuine in domestic violence crimes. "Such victims are often reluctant to participate fully in the prosecution of their abuser" (Finn, 2003, p.
To be recognized, revenues must also be realized or realizable and A. Foreseeable B. Collected C. Earned D. Shipped Original AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Legal AICPA FN: Research Bloom's: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy 2. The SEC requires all of the following for revenue to be recognized except A. Cash is collected.
Individuals who are law-abiding citizens should be able to rest and know that the streets are free from persons who have committed crimes such as armed robbery and other felony crimes. An offender who has committed felony crimes previously should be disciplined much harshly than the times before. According to the criminologist, the punishment which an individual commits should be harsher than the crime which has been committed. The current recommendations for the prison term policy for an individual who has committed armed robbery should be as follow: Each is a repeat offender of an armed robbery will do a maximum sentence of 10-20 years. Along, with the 10-20 years, 10 -15 years of probation will be added.
A number of researchers have argued that many crime problems can be addressed more efficiently if police officers focus their attention on these deviant places. The appeal of focusing limited resources on a small number of high-activity crime places is straightforward. If crime can be prevented at these problem places, then police will be well positioned to lower citywide crime rates. In Policing Problem Places, Anthony Braga and David Weisburd make the case that hot spots policing is an effective approach to crime prevention that should be engaged by police departments in the United States and other countries. There is a strong and growing body of rigorous scientific evidence that the police can control crime hot spots without simply displacing crime problems to other places.
Neither model allows for the “right” or “wrong” method, but simply debates the amount of government involvement, so both are equally important to understand. What role does law enforcement play? Under the crime control model, law enforcement plays a very large role as this model is based on the theory that crime is reduced from more arrests, convictions, and harsher sentencing. This increases the amount of officers in given areas to provide a more “tough on crime” standard of policing. According to Packers theory, the crime control model also leans more toward the idea that the costs associated with providing criminals “rights” are wasteful and would be better applied towards building new prisons and hiring more police officers (Packer, 1968).
Police chiefs surveyed nationwide have come to the same conclusion. They declared that the most ways to reduce violent crimes is to increase the number of police officers on the street, reduce drug abuse, and create a better economy with more jobs. Lastly, the ACLU and police officers alike believe the death penalty is a waste of taxpayers’ money and does not even deter violent crime. The FBI has found that the states using the death penalty have the highest murder
While AWR Hawkins explains that there’s no relation between gun control and crime, and that gun control might possibly be directly related to more violent crimes resulting in death. * Each author takes a strong stance on both of their views. Boseley takes a strong stance that more guns in the US is actually the cause of more gun related deaths, while Hawkins writes that more gun control leads to higher death rates. * The intended audience for both authors would be readers that take their side. Boseley’s audience would tend to be people who agree that heightened gun control in the US would lead to less deaths in major cities like Detroit or New York.
Incarceration further reassures society and the victims that a criminal will receive a fair punishment. Moreover, incapacitation or incarceration protects society from career criminals, and criminals who pose a serious threat to members of the community, but the fact of the matter is by doubling the prison term for armed robbery is not going to correct or solve the underlying issues that force one to commit the act of robbery and in return, the prison systems will continue to