The Yalta Conference

356 Words2 Pages
The Yalta conference at the time that it was held was viewed as probably a big success and a turning point in World War II. President Roosevelt said in his report to congress “The three most powerful nations have agreed that the political and economic problems of any are liberated from Nazi conquest, or any former Axis satellites, are a joint responsibility of all three governments.” The three major nations; United States of America, Great Britain and Soviet Union; had come to 3 major agreements at the Yalta Conference. They had all agreed upon not stopping the war until Germany unconditionally surrendered, they would not attack Japan until they had finished in Europe and concept of the second front. This was considered to be great progress towards ending the war. All of these things contributed to why the Yalta Conference was a success. However, there were also some faults and disagreements that made the Yalta Conference a not a complete success in many minds. At the Yalta Conference there were many disagreements that were left unresolved. One of which was the influence on the government of Poland. U.S. and Great Britain let Stalin’s government take over Poland under some conditions. These conditions were that Stalin can only influence Poland’s governments not force them to become a certain type of government, and there would be a free election within every two years which was left very vague. “In an article by Richard M. Ebeling, he states “Using his own Marxian definition of “democracy” and “freedom” Stalin – and later his soviet inheritors—could claim the right to impose their own will and political order on the unfortunate people in this part of the world.” This quote gives an idea about how Stalin had found a way to get around the conditions that the western allied powers had imposed. This was part of the reason that the Yalta Conference was considered not a
Open Document