The Way We Never Were

1838 Words8 Pages
The Way We Never Were In Stephanie Coontz's book, "The Way We Never Were," the author debunks the myths and disillusioned ideals of family life that we think were present in the 1950s. This essay looks at the strengths and weaknesses of her argument. Despite the nostalgia for the 1950s, people do not really miss the family structure of the time as much as they miss what they think they don't have now: a seemingly more family-friendly and stable economic and social environment. 1.Coontz argued that "Families comparing their prospects in the 1950s to their unstable, often uncomfortable pasts, especially the two horrible decades before."(33).This is the foundation for the "hopefulness" that people associate with the 1950s family structure/existence. Families were finally becoming stable when the stock market crashed in 1929 and brought on the Great Depression. During the end of Great Depression, World War II had begun. The opportunities available in the later 40s, early 50s did not include everyone because WWII was just ending and so many people needed a job when so little were available. Gender roles suddenly started to come into play. The idea that men are superior and should be the primary breadwinner, while women, inferior to the men, should be a stay at home mom, who cooks, cleans and watches the kids. Shows such as Ozzie and Harriet, Leave it to Beaver, Father Knows Best, and Donna Reed aired showing how families wanted their lives to be like. 2. Coontz argues about social problems stemming from the 1950s and how they affected the family structure. She states that people don't miss the way women were treated, and they sure wouldn't want to live with most of the fathers they knew in their neighborhoods" (33). This is a clear example that people do not really miss the family structure of the time. The families of the time, because of the miss treatment of women,
Open Document