The Similarities and Differences of Social Responsibility

2078 Words9 Pages
Abstract This paper searches three printed articles that report on the outcomes of inquiries performed on online (Internet) about the similarities and differences of social responsibility of businesses to its employees, shareholders, and the public in its entirety. The articles, conversely, fluctuate in their explanations of social responsibility and the way that it should be utilized. Social responsibility within an organization is thoughtful among social, ethnic, economic, and ecological problems, while mainly Dr. Drucker and Dr. Cohen agree, Mr. Friedman believes otherwise. Cohen (2009) suggest that Dr. Peter Drucker, believed that organizations with power equals responsibility; therefore, having an organization as a social establishment must have social responsibility. Drucker (1979) suggest that a corporation or a business should be responsible for the effect it has on its staff, location, or anything it may come in contact with which is considered social responsibility. Friedman (1970) propose that a corporation cannot and do not have social responsibilities, only individual personnel within a corporation. This paper analyzes Cohen (2009) research with four other books to suggest that social responsibility is the responsibility of businesses to its employees, shareholders, and the public in its entirety. The Similarities and Differences of Social Responsibility Dr. Peter Drucker, Dr. William A. Cohen and Milton Friedman have differences and similarities of opinion about social responsibility. Social responsibility within an organization is thoughtful among social, ethnic, economic, and ecological problems, while mainly Dr. Drucker and Dr. Cohen agree, Mr. Friedman believes otherwise. While being green is when a business or corporation attempt to have a constructive influence on the environment and the public which is mainly the beliefs of

More about The Similarities and Differences of Social Responsibility

Open Document