“The admission culture of selective colleges today is characterized by a rising degree of deception and –no doubt, unintended –cruelty” (Delbanco 117). The selectivity of colleges, especially those of Ivy Leagues, can be hard to put into comparison with other colleges and universities. Ivy Leagues run on their own system, and no one can tell them how to do things because they have been established in America the longest. Colleges do not do this on purpose; it is just the way the system works. “Recruited athletes, alumni children, faculty children, members of historically underrepresented minority groups, and ‘development cases’ have an advantage, and by the time they have all been accounted for, the number of slots remaining can be extremely small compared with the ever-growing applicant pool” (Delbanco 117).
In contrast, for football and basketball, the NBA and NFL have rules in place that makes it so these young athletes must play in college before entering the draft to play as a pro. This can be a problem for some athletes who need money to support their families or themselves. Another rule by the NCAA is that collegiate athletes cannot earn money for their talents, whether it is by sponsorships, boosters, talent scouts for universities, or even people who would just like these athletes to play for a certain college. These rules raise the question, should college athletes be compensated for their talent? Many believe that a problem with paying college athletes is that their maturity level is not to the point where they can handle a large sum of money.
The high cost of the college books is not only an issue in the United States, it has affected the students worldwide. Students from every country have been fronting the similar topic regarding the cost of the text books. Due to the advanced technology in education, it is not affordable for the colleges as well to provide the books to students free of cost. There are numerous reasons and the solutions to the issue of overpriced text book. In this essay, I seek to argue that students should pay their textbook fees without depending upon the schools.
He believes not everyone should go to college to pursue a major just because they want to make a lot of money. Murray states something that it is true, ‘Young people with okay-but-not-great academic ability who are thinking about whether to go after a B.A. need to consider the competition they will face after they graduate.’(Murray,2008). If all people want to get into the business, finance, and/or management world once graduated they might have a rough time. There are certain skills needed to be successful, even when giving orders to other people.
Speaking with the Assistant Dean of Student Affairs at the University of Rhode Island, Earl N. Smith III, the questioned was posed, "should collegian athletes be paid for their services while representing their universities?" Smith responded, "Yes, it all comes down to ethics. These kids generate huge sums of money for the NCAA and its universities and some of them come from extreme hardship. It is more than just a college tuition that they need. You have travel, clothes; a lot goes into college other than tuition (E.N.
Amateurism has nothing to do with why fans love college sports. They watch these college sports because fans love to see students representing their respective colleges. The NCAA’s reasoning behind keeping the student-athletes amateurs is entirely flawed. As everyone knows, college is the time where all students learn to grow and begin their careers for the future. The only thing that the NCAA is doing is restricting these athletes from progression in their professional careers and education.
Why Uniforms Should Not Be Mandatory Many people have been talking about how enforcing students to wear uniforms to school but I have to disagree. As much as there are advantages to having uniforms there are even more disadvantages to having them. There will be 3 reasons that I will be discussing about in this essay. Reasons are the highly expensive cost, stealing style and individuality from the students and the level of uncomfort uniforms provide. Uniforms are expensive, it might not be to wealthy families but it is a lot to families who are less fortunate.
But should companies like Nike have to give student athletes a piece of their jersey sales? Absolutely. The NCAA throws the word amateurism around far too often. There is a fine line between remaining an amateur and becoming a professional in the eyes of the NCAA. Turning pro does not guarantee endorsements and royalties; it simply means that an athlete will be paid to play for his organization.
Not only does media impact the bias but so does public education, growing p in public schools you hear how the government is not funding enough money to education, teachers aren't getting enough money , yet we still stand for the pledge. This is an influential part of political socialization because it molded me going onto the future, having a state of mind where government is not perfecta and it should not stay this
On the other hand, it is my opinion that student athletes should not be paid; because, scholarships usually cover a big deal of expenses, it would be unfair to their peers, and most colleges and money could change the way a