He then argues that albeit people may cerebrate that college graduates with liberal arts degrees are having a more arduous time finding good jobs, that is not the case. In authenticity today’s job market is arduous for all college graduates, regardless of their major. In his third point, Ungar disputes the view that the liberal arts are particularly extraneous for low-income individuals. He verbalizes that they albeit they may not have the same edifying background as their more affluent peers, they catch up expeditious. They deserve the well-rounded edification that the liberal arts has to offer as much as anyone else.
Also stated was that Presidents of colleges were being overpaid. They go on to say Colleges shouldn't have to pay more to get a qualified President to run their school. The President should be pleased with a modest salary and if they aren’t then they probably don't need to have the title anyhow. Another suggestion was that spin-off schools preoccupy faculties and school presidents. They state that it takes away the much needed attention
Although most people go to college to earn a degree, going to college is not necessarily the best choice for everyone. He says that if some students are not getting their money’s worth in college, they should go to vocational school to be better prepared rather than going to college that’s not worth it for them. Some people could argue that it is unnecessary to make everyone go to college, high school graduates will be better prepared by continuing their education to get theoretical and practical knowledge for their careers. I decided to be a freshman in college this year because I wanted to prepare myself for a good career in the future by learning knowledge in the specific field I want to be. I also like to learn, my second reason to continue my education.
And above all else, money for instance, it seems to make them healthier and happier. The first of the anti-college arguments to be explored is the ever so misleading financial burden, the money. Leonhardt give two main reasons why the increasing student debt and startling tuition costs aren’t normally a problem for graduating students. First off, once you look into college tuition rates and any financial aid is taken into account, average fees and tuition were only about $2,000 at public four-year colleges(647). His next big point
Our political leaders and Delbanco can both concur that a liberal education is important, but can both see eye to eye that it is what the future economy will be built off of. In our nation it has become more and more difficult for our citizens to attain this college degree, because it is becoming less and less affordable. Alongside both parties, most American’s can agree that a liberal education is important, but neither the Republican Party nor the Democratic Party have made any significant change to better the liberal education system. According to the Obama Administration, President Obama has “proposed incentives for states to maintain their commitments to higher education through a new $1 billion investment” (“Keeping Costs Down”), and Obama has failed to accomplish his proposal. Obama needs to manage the budget a bit more wisely, because the more funding put towards the liberal education system, the more our economy will flourish.
This complaint is viable and displays one of the clear drawbacks of a corporate-university relationship (81). Limiting consumers’ choice in any instance puts them at a disadvantage, because if they are unable to purchase anything but products produced by one company, that company has significant control over the prices it can charge due to the creation of an inelastic demand curve. This is a prime example of the waning freedom of choice that Ms. Croissant criticizes in her essay. Along these lines comes the identity-forming process that students go through during their collegiate years. Young people tend to form much of their identity during that first taste of freedom they get during their time in college.
The passage of the “Pick the Public’s Pocket No More” bill would lower college application rates, lower college graduation rates, and lower our country’s number of new college graduates for open positions in the work force. Without grants, many Americans would not be able to pursue college degrees because of the debt they would acquire financing their degree with loans alone. Federal grants allow young adults, who are the future of our country, to pursue a college degree without the full burden of college debts after graduation. (M) When considering whether or not to pursue a degree, many are persuaded to apply because they often receive grants to assist
The bottom line is that the high and rising cost of college isn’t a good thing and reduces the amount of qualified workers. Steps need to be made in bringing down the price to a point that both the universities and students agree on, and possibly offering more opportunities for financial aid from the institutions and the government itself.
A management work considers more of a doing paper work whereas labor work needs hand skills. I believe qualified workers worth going to college because they make more money in less period of time. While I was reading the Kid Pharaoh’s interview, I came to know that he doesn’t support education at all. He thinks it’s not
When “the average American’s savings may be near .0% of their disposable income” (Mendelson, 132), this leaves almost no chance for children to receive assistance from their parents when paying tuition. Companies should take the lead from companies like Northrop Grumman and should follow in suit with assisting their co-workers who want to earn a degree with as much resources available. This is a great way to alleviate the stress of employees finding a way to pay for college and a win-win resolution for companies that aid their employees by providing a quality education while keeping those valued employees in their payroll. Works Cited Hunt, Lauren. "Statistics on Adults Returning to College."