His belief in Democracy was understandable and is still held in a similar way today by many people. But while demorcracy does help immensely with the formation of a nation, Pericles failed to address that none of the positive attributes stemming from democracy would be possible without the positive actions of his people, with or without it. He didn't necessarily give credit
Was Sparta a better place to live in than Athens? The two rivals of Ancient Greece were Athens and Sparta. They were so close to each other on the globe but how they went about life was so different. The two city-states had hardly any similarities. The Athenians wanted to have a perfect government for their people while Sparta wanted a perfect military.
Setting goals give followers a common end to work towards. Setting goals can help workers stay focused and motivated President Lincoln is one of the great leaders of our nation. He displayed many leadership qualities that made him successful. By displaying President Lincoln’s leadership qualities,
Although it can be argued that Alcibiades initiated the invasion, Athens’s would not have led a costly campaign to Sicily just because of one man. Furthermore, there was no need to spread Democracy to Sicily as Syracuse itself was using this ideology. Sparta led a campaign to Thrace in order to exploit the local mines and timber there, for their own benefit and as a way of weakening Athens. The Old Oligarch tells us that Athens’s trade vastly improved as their Empire increased; therefore acting as a cause of conflict as Athens would want to improve their economy which could only be done by engaging in conflict with other city states. The Old Oligarch is reasonably reliable as it is a piece of archaeological evidence which was supposedly written by Xenophon.
A large part ancient Greek culture was the role the people played in the community and the hospitality they showed. The citizens had responsibilities to act on what was right or wrong and had a role to speak up for what was right, those who didn’t were thought of as weaker, cowardly people. For example while the suitors were taking advantage of Odysseus’ house, food, and belongings nobody in the community was brave enough to step up and take action until Telemakhos gained the courage, causing him to start to be conveyed as a strong, bold character. In contrast to the suitors Telemakhos also showed hospitality, when a stranger showed up at his door, he quickly invited him in and made him feel at home. The Greek concept of hospitality was important because they never knew when a God would come to their home in disguise so it was important to be welcoming to all guests.
The great Athenian Empire was formed through the important actions of individuals and events. Whilst no one individual can take the credit for the formation on the Empire; certainly influential people such as Themistocles, Aristides, Cimon, Pausanius, Miltiades and Pericles all play very important roles in the formation of the Athenian Empire. Other factors, such as the coastal Greek states choosing Athens (contrary to Thucydides’ belief) over Sparta and the Persian threat helped keep the allies in line and enabled Athens to steadily take over. Whether it be through political reforms or military campaigns, these individuals played a crucial part in the formation of the powerful Athenian Empire. When assessing the individuals during the pentacontaetia, it seems logical to start with Miltiades.
He also believed that no one’s contribution to the democracy should be effected as a result of their poverty. He believed that Athens at this time in history was a good representation of what a democratic government really was, as every individual was just as interested in the affairs of the state as they were in their own affairs, so each person therefore took pride in the state. He said that even people who are consumed by their own interests are still actively involved in the politics, and if there is a man that usually minds his
His power over the Athenian people, although not completely unchallenged, was maintained under the guise of merely a statesman. As sited by pbs.org, the historian Thucydides said it best: “In name democracy, but in fact the rule of one man” (para 5). Pericles began his speech with a treatise on Athenian ancestors. They were willing to do what it took to leave a better Athens for all to enjoy freely. In his words, they “spared no pains to be able to leave their acquisitions to us of the present generation” (Pericles para 4).
After this, all citizens could be considered equal before the law and guaranteed freedom of speech. This group of officials that carried out daily government business called an Assembly served as a supreme court. In my opinion, the Athenian democracy was very fair in giving every citizen the chance of voting and choosing what they wanted for Athens. This government was effective but it did not apply for all the people that lived in Athens so it affected the non-citizens of Athens because they were excluded from political life. Rome`s government was organized into executive and legislative branches, both of these branches were under patrician control.
Socrates lived as an independent man. he did not want to go under any category. He was not paid for his "irony" and maieutics. Therefore he was not a sophist, as being a sophist was having a profession. Socrates was genuinely worried about why the young men were so disappointing.