However, the other key aspect of this company is citizenship, and none of the traditional measurements have a significant impact on success in that aspect. In Table 3.2, there is a high level of citizenship that can be successfully correlated between the biodata information and the candidate. The p-score is only 0.01 and the correlation score is one of the highest at 0.22. This means that this measurement can draw out the individuals who score high on this correlation to be successful in understanding and being a part of the successful team environment. The biodata also has the highest correlation for promotion potential, but I hesitate in advising using this exclusively due to the expense and time needed for this
The following is my evaluation of Table 3.1 Data: The education predictor has very low correlation with citizenship and absence measures. Citizenship is shown to be positive and absence is shown to be negative; however, they are both close to 0. On the contrary, the correlations between education and the performance and promotion potential are slightly higher than citizenship and absence, but they are still undesirably low. Out of these 4 measures, the correlation between education and promotional potential is considered to be the highest because education can definitely predict a future employee’s promotion potential. Promotion potential has a p value of <.01 which makes it statistically significant.
According to our analysis of these case, Sure Tech and E-Drive are in better overall position. E-Drive performance better in our supplier scorecard analysis in quoted price, quality, and capacity. Although Sure Tech is not doing outstanding on any categories of the scorecard, their overall score is in the second place. Moreover, they were lowest on total cost analysis.
Even though the p-value for our Intercept and DAYS increased, it didn’t affect the significance of our model. Getting rid of PAYOR variable didn’t have much of a significant change on our PHYS p-value as it did for our Intercept and DAYS. The overall p-value changed from 2.73E-63 to 1.51E-64, however, the number is still low and there is still a low chance of inaccuracies in this model right now. In order to make this model more accurate, I am going to take PHYS out of the
the Credit Balance (X) we saw that there is a strong positive slope, meaning that customers who carry a larger credit balance usually will also have higher income as shown in the best-fit line. For linear regression equation we have the following; Income ($1000) = -3.51589 + 0.0119264 Credit Balance($). From this, we can see the B0= -3.51589, which is also the Y intercept, while B1 is 0.0119264 is the slope for this variable. The coefficient of correlation and the coefficient of determination both showed a positive strong relationship between the two variable of Credit Balance (X) and Income (Y). The R^2=86.52%, while R=0.80.
They found that there was a high inter-rater reliability which showed that the diagnosis of phobia is reliable. However they only looked at social phobias and didn’t consider any specific phobias therefore it cannot be generalised meaning that it is low in external validity. Also they only used interviews which means there are issues with self-report data. Social desirability bias could also occur as the participants may act in a certain way to make themselves look better even though it’s not necessarily their true behaviour. The other way of examining reliability is through test re-test, which is
All humanistic studies are conducted unscientifically. This is a strength of this is that they are less artificial in the way they conduct their studies, this in turn makes the tests more ecologically valid. However a weakness of this is that they have no objective results and they are unable to control variables. This makes causality harder to establish and means psychologists are unable to predict what is going to happen. The humanistic approach represents the ‘healthy half of psychology’ and suggests that we are all with good intentions.
In the process, they could hold back a number of potential rebellions and create a consensus of popular support for the rule of a new, privileged leadership.When we look at the American Revolution this way, it was a work of genius, and the Founding Fathers deserve the awed tribute they have received over the centuries. They created the most effective system of national control devised in modern times, and showed future generations of leaders the advantages of combining paternalism with command. 2. According to Zinn, how did the creation of the United States benefit the upper class? They created a world where a few families owned most of the wealth.
I arrived at this conclusion through evaluating the consensus of results from each ethical theory. Each theory (aside from Deontology, where both options failed) pointed towards Francine reporting the error as the ethical solution. As a Utilitarian, the career and University-related benefits (yielding 14 utile’s) far outweighed the extra compensation she would have earned had she not reported the error (only 2 utile’s). As a Virtue Ethicist, reporting the error is the only decision that coincides with the Francine’s virtues (honesty, loyalty, ambition). When taking a Rawlsian perspective, reporting the error is the only rational and fair policy with respect to compensation of all Mogwai University employees and both options failed to pass the deontological
Level of evidence #6 according to Melnyk and Overhault’s (2011) pyramid . This was the only study that closely matched the PICOT question. Though this study had better technique for sampling than the other studies, it still could not be generalized to the whole population. This study found the “ strongest predictors of vaccination intent included high perceived benefits of being vaccinated and low perceived