Structured Social Inequality

1239 Words5 Pages
Structured Social Inequality: “One-Size-Fits-All” My Grandfather sat me down one day, before I went off to high school, and said, “Brookie don’t worry about fitting in- I can barely fit into my denim jeans- but just know when I put on my “one-size-fits-all” jeans, I’m accomplishing something in life.” Moreover, as silly as his advice sounded, I didn’t grasp what he was trying to say, until I graduated four years later. Unfortunately, in America, “one-size-fits-all” is not a term that’s part of its American terminology, let alone the American school system. Likewise, South Forsyth, my high-school, was a mirror image of social inequality, and the only way to survive was through your family’s status. Moreover, the majority of my high-school classmates, either fitted into the social class system, or they simply didn’t fit into it at all. However, I was one of the few kids that stuck to my grandfather’s advice, and didn’t let the norms of social inequality affect me. To begin with, the social class structure of South Forsyth was set up in three basic structures. The first of the three structures was the lower-upper class students. These students were obviously top of the food chain, and were recognized for their opulent materials. The second of the three structures were upper-middle class peers. Moreover, the upper-middle class contained students that weren’t as wealthy as the lower-upper class students, however they still made a statement by the clothes they wore, or the sports cars they drove. To continue, the last of the social class structures for South Forsyth was the lower-middle class students. Although these students were better off than some of the surrounding social class structures, these students were still considered “the unfortunate” of the three social class structures. To conclude, these social structures all made up South Forsyth, and each had their
Open Document