Anthropology 120G: Human Ancestors

1867 Words8 Pages
Anthropology 120G: Human Ancestors This essay will discuss how the modern interpretation of evolution works, and the implications it has for the way humans look at themselves and other species. Natural Selection Natural selection is “the process that produces adaptation.”[Boyd, R & Silk, J. (2006). How humans evolved. United States of America.] It is based on three assumptions: 1) the accessibility of resources is limited; 2) organisms change in the capability of surviving and reproducing; and 3) traits that effect survival and reproduction are transfer from parents to descendants. When these three assumptions is in place, natural selection produces adaptation. [Boyd, R & Silk, J. (2006). How humans evolved. United…show more content…
3) The function of morphological feature or behaviors can be determine by comparing the traits of different species.” Phylogenetic tree is different from the staircase leading to humans. Phylogenetic trees are spread out and has derived characters between each of the common ancestors. Staircase leading to humans is in steps, for example at the bottom of the ladder would be treeshrew which is a single celled organisms, then it's torsier, lemur, new world monkey, old world monkey, ape and finally humans who are at the top of the ladder. [Boyd, R & Silk, J. (2006). How humans evolved. United States of America]. A cladogenetic view of evolution doesn’t search for or assume "missing links" or small middle stages. As a substitute, it looks for the "common ancestors" of two or more species, for example “the grandfather species that divided into two or more lineages.” New species often occur in small populations, “this view accepts that major morphological or physiological changes between a parent and daughter species can occur over a short time span.” Common ancestors are a group of organisms that has the same background. All living organisms on earth are descended from a common…show more content…
The reason is because not all of the countries have sources such as technologies, facilities (e.g schools and universities). Therefore, some human populations may be more advanced intellectually than others. The technologically that are more advancd societies isn't necessarily the ones whose physical traits will dominate our species in the future. The reason is because not all of the advanced societies people have the 'complete' physical traits to dominate the human species in the future. People who live in the undeveloped countries could may be the ones to bring in new knowledge. Another implication is that rich people are not biologically superior to poor people. The idea of the "survival of the fitness" was included in between the rich and poor, stimulating the theories of racial and high class superior. The rich people believed they were stronger and managed to "fight for survival" better than the poor. This issue happened from the past, for example, African-American were seen as lower-class people and had to be slaves because they were seen as different. This leads to the idea of Christianity being superior than Buddhism. I believe Christians are not biologically superior to Buddhists. The reason is because both of these religions have different beliefs and opinions about life and death. Although “Christians don't believe that other religions are wrong but only that they are less accurate
Open Document