Southern Vs. Northern Racism: Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

2043 Words9 Pages
Southern vs. Northern Racism: Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s Struggle The mid-1900s was a time when America was torn apart by racism. However, the racism that plagued this nation was entirely different in the South in comparison to the North. This difference led to a dissimilar attitude among the oppressed blacks of the South versus those of the North. After finding success in his Southern struggle against racism, Martin Luther King, Jr. found himself at a loss for tactics, faced with a population of blacks to which he could neither relate nor muster support. These vast differences led to King's severe difficulty in dealing with the racism of the North, indirectly contributing to his subsequent downfall. Each year, beginning in kindergarten,…show more content…
The Birmingham movement was a campaign organized by the SCLC to draw attention to the unfair treatment endured by blacks in Birmingham, Alabama. The movement ran throughout the spring of 1963, resulting in highly publicized confrontations between the youths of the African American communities and white authorities. King knew it would take more than demonstrations to come out victorious, and he knew exactly what it would take: children. To have youth demonstrators, to King, would open the nations eyes to the evil that he had been trying to expose for so long. Children are children, regardless of race, and King knew that the mistreatment of these children would expose the violence that had been ever-present in Birmingham. This, however, was not a popular suggestion among black parents and family members. They scolded King for being so inconsiderate, but they knew that there was really no other way that could be nearly effective. Nevertheless, one day in May of 1963, over one thousand black youths did not attend school. Instead, the students gathered together and prepared to demonstrate. They were given instructions to continue their assigned demonstration path until they were put under arrest – and several hundred of these students were, indeed, arrested. In addition to the violence against children in Birmingham, Chief Commisioner Eugene “Bull” Connor…show more content…
This racism was so deeply rooted into society that it almost didn't exist as actual “racism”. More than half of the black population of Chicago (about 2 million people) were among those living in the hardest poverty in the city. Racism was not broadcasted on television, because everybody knew what went on – and did not seem to mind it at all. In the real estate business, the separation of blacks and whites was clear. Not only were blacks of equal family and income denied housing in certain areas, but the real estate business did not bother hiding it. They did not bother making up excuses as to why the white family received housing over the black family. It was simply the way it was. This, however, does not mean that blacks accepted it as moral and just. Just as blacks in the south, they wanted equal rights. However, there was one major difference: there were no laws in the north pertaining to the black community. There were no political figures to fight. In the south, civil rights protestors had a battle laid out for them: they had the Jim Crow laws to deem unjust; they had the numerous bombings directed toward important black icons to protest. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s “expose the evil” tactic worked so well in the south because so much of the evil was easily spotted. On the contrary, the search for the true “evil” in the north was a difficult one.
Open Document