Sociological Approaches to Health and Ill-Health

1649 Words7 Pages
Sociological Approaches to Health and ill–Health P2 – Explain different sociological approaches to health and ill-health In this criteria I will be explaining the health and ill-health in different sociological perspectives. Health is the condition of our body working effectively. Therefore, health is the physical, mental and social well-being of the absence of being ill or having a disease. Ill-health is when your body is not functioning well, you may have a disease, an illness and be sick. This is the opposite of health. Functionalism Functionalism is a consensus conflict. Functionalists believe that health is ensuring that people within society have a good health. By having a good health you will need to be wealthy so you can eat and drink well. However, this is barrier to most individuals. In society it has been researched and discovered that ill-health will occur in a society. In a society there will be wealthy people and poor people so therefore it means that not all individuals will be able to keep healthy because they are not all wealthy. Some people will not be able to afford medicine or treatment to recover whilst others can. Talcott Parsons argues that illness is a form of deviance and it disrupts the social function of a society. He believed that society will function effectively if the individuals in society have a good health. ‘He described illness as a form of deviance and ill members as performing a form of social role – sick role.’ – Quote from, Stretch B Whitehouse M BTEC Level 3 Nationals in Health and Social Care Book 1 (2010:319). Functionalists have stated that if individuals declare their ill, there will be a new role which had specific rights and responsibilities that needs to be fulfilled if you’re considered ill. Talcott Parsons had created this new role which was known as sick role (medical sociological term for being ill) the
Open Document