Social and Environmental Irresponsibility

3953 Words16 Pages
Social and Environmental Irresponsibility: the Case of BP As companies continue to evolve and are now more influenced than before by the impact of social and environmental responsibility, corporate social responsibility (CSR) and environmental social responsibility (ESR) has been a debated topic of discussion for many researchers (Lin-Hi & Müller, 2013; Uecker-Mercado & Walker, 2012). To understand what corporate and environmental social irresponsibility is, one must first understand what corporate and environmental social responsibility is. Although there is a growing increase around this topic, it is hard to generalize what corporate social and environmental responsibility is (Lin-Hi & Müller, 2013). This is simply the fact that it is difficult to define what are acceptable principles that are considered responsible and, as one person may define harmful may not be in the eyes of another individual, which is a clear example of ethical relativism (Lawrence & Weber, 2011). Murphy and Schlegelmilch (2013) states that “a lack of a common definition of CSR is to be expected because (a) CSR is an umbrella term for many related concepts and (b) CSR naturally evolves over time as values change… CSR might be seen as inherently subjective” (pp. 1808). However, for the purpose of this research paper, corporate social responsibility can be defined as how the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCS) defined it: “the commitment of business to contribute to sustainable economic development, working with employees, their families, the local community, and society at large to improve their quality of life ” (Hys & Hawrysz, 2012, pp.1515). Environmental social responsibility and social responsibility are very much linked to each other. Due to the limited research around ESR, a clear definition could not be obtained; however, Uecker-Mercado & Walker

More about Social and Environmental Irresponsibility

Open Document