Should Death Penalty Be Legal As a Form Of Punishm

1264 Words6 Pages
In 1991, Troy Davis was sentenced to death for the murder of a police officer Mark Allen Macphail in Savannah, Georgia. The case against Troy Davis primarily based on only witness testimony without any DNA evidence. Since his 1991 trial, seven of key nine witnesses even changed their testimonies; some claiming police forced them to. However, after years of appeal did not prove his innocent, Troy Davis was finally executed in September 2011 with he still claiming himself innocent. On the same day, Iran publicly hanged a 17-year old boy, name Alireza Molla-Soltani had convicted of killing a popular athlete despite international prohibitions against executing juveniles. He claimed his killing as part of a self-defense. Death penalty is always a controversial topic for over the decades. First and foremost, according to dictionary, death penalty is one of the capital punishment of death sentence awarded for capital offences like crimes involving planned murder, multiple murders, repeated crimes, rape and murder where in the criminal provisions consider such persons as a gross danger to the existence of the society and provide death punishment. In my opinion, death penalty should not be legalize as a form of punishment in law. There are several reasons to support my position of death penalty should not be legalize as a form of capital punishment. The main reason I against death penalty should be legal as a form of punishment is because death penalty is a flawed legal system. Death penalty many times has the possibility exists that innocent man and women may be put to death. There are several documented cases where DNA testing showed that innocent people were put to death by government. Besides, some cases may involve in political or religious issues that were injustice where innocent people were convicted execution. For example, early in China the government had
Open Document