Short Essay: Justice in Measure for Measure

648 Words3 Pages
In Measure for Measure, Shakespeare creates a city inhabited by a plethora of law-enforcers and law-breakers, and acquaints us with two rather contrary characters: The Duke, who believes in the laws of nature, and Lord Angelo, a firm believer in positive law. When Claudio commits lechery and is sentenced to death, Shakespeare uses the actions of the Duke and Lord Angelo to develop the basic philosophical issue in the play, the tension between the merciful employment of the spirit of the law and the harsh employment of the letter of the law. In terms of notions of righteousness, Angelo believes that the law is, without exception, synonymous with justice. Though he is devoutly religious, it is not necessarily accurate to say that he governs by the words of God; it is more that the laws of the time, which he protects so feverishly, were based in large part on the Bible. His character is hungry for an idealistic type of justice because he is young and free from indiscretion and therefore naive, which leads him to believe that living life without giving in to worldly desires is a task that people are actually capable of. In contrast, Duke Vincentio has lived and experienced enough to know that no man can carry out an existence free from transgressions. He believes that you should judge people in the same way that you would judge yourself. As law-enforcers, the Duke and Angelo do not differ completely in their feelings about the law. The Duke is concerned that the laws have become useless, likening them to a rod, which becomes mocked when it’s used long enough to scare rather than to punish. Likewise, Angelo demands that no one make a “scarecrow” of the law. The difference is that Angelo upholds the law fearlessly and unmercifully. In modern times, he would be similar to the ambitious district attorney who believes that if a law exists, it must always be enforced. The
Open Document