Good job! Now, I have some suggestions on how we can improve this paper, so let’s get started, shall we? Main Idea/Thesis: Let’s work on your thesis first, Ashley. I noticed that you were not able to present a clear subject and key points for discussion that are necessary for a good thesis statement. A thesis statement is important in any essay because it serves as the basis of your entire discussion.
Throughout it we can relate to this group of narrators in their description of the girls. We see their slightly biased selection of quotes and feel that they are just as normal as we are. The writer telling the story has a much easier time of thinking about the facts of the reality he has created when he is fictionally an active member of it. Although his narrators are not his normal voice, they are still a part of his writing self. They still must go through the filter of his conscious thought to be allowed to write the story.
It is my opinion the writer used this element well, as it grabbed my attention and made it a fun and interesting reading. It also built that small mystery regarding if she was speaking the truth or not, as midpoint thru the reading it made me question her gender preference which I found humorous. In Brady, J. (1971) “I Want a Wife,” she used the final statement “My God, who wouldn’t want a wife?” in order to draw a conclusion to the reader that she was making a statement based on experiences. The way I Plan on using the literary elements in my essay would be by using Tone and Language expression that will help the reader paint a mental picture of a current situation within my essay.
She explains in the beginning of the article that Hamlet was her opportunity to prove her friend wrong when he told her "one can easily misinterpret the universal by misunderstanding the particular" (Bohannan.197). Bohannan believes that the Tiv will understand Hamlet because she believes that, Human nature is pretty much the same the whole world over; at least the general plot and motivation of greater tragedies would always be clear—everywhere—although some details of costume might have to be explained and difficulties of translation might produce other slight changes. (Bohannan.197) Bohannan, however, came across with many difficulties in telling Hamlet to the Tiv. She found that the Tiv misunderstood and argued with the details of the story more than the plot and the whole events of the play. The first example of misunderstanding was the word "ghost".
After reading this article, I started to pay closer attention to this poor-putting issue and I noticed that everything he points out is entirely true! The thing that I liked the most about this article was his introduction/title. The title “Why Women Putt Worse than Men” is shocking because nobody has really posed the question before and I commend him for it. His article was probably frowned upon at first but if women would just read it, they could start to ask themselves, “Why am I not doing the same things that the guys are doing?”, and it would actually help their putting. His cover page shows a woman in a putting stance with a guy in a lab suit watching her every move and a bunch of gauges surrounding her which implies that they are going to back up that title with some case studies and statistical analyses.
Therefore, I am implementing other ideas that will be more flexible making my writing a more gratifying process. I decided to just start writing and not using writing rules for my first draft. Anne Lamott, the author of “Shitty Firsts Drafts,” states that, “almost all good writing begins with terrible
Woolf Critique Virginia Woolf’s quote “Money dignifies what is frivolous if unpaid for.” stood out before this viewer even understood what she meant. Writing only for herself or even as an outlet for her creativity meant people would in effect write her off. This particular presentation was very well put together, in that the background was soft and not a distraction, yet it was that of an intellectual atmosphere. Eileen Atkins was a splendid mix of anger, reserve and power, as she fluidly rolled through the script, capturing the emotional changes and subtleties necessary for this piece to retain its affectivness. The perceived differences from the video to the reading were, for this reader/viewer, the tone.
In taking her readers on this journey, Roach sought to inform them about the strange and important lives of people postmortem, something which is rarely thought about or discussed. She accomplishes this through the use of syntax, a wide variety of facts, and well placed humor. One of the initial things the reader will notice is the way the text is presented, and Mary Roach definitely uses syntax to her advantage. Roach writes in first person, which is unusual for a non-fiction book. By doing this, she makes the book read like a narrative, providing the text with intimacy.
I used to read more books that talked about the reality I lived in or science fiction. The way they were written it was amazingly interesting for me, like I would spent days and late nights just to get to the end. The opportunity to read showed me that there were so many ways that I could learn both fun and educational faces of the reading field. When I was in the fifth grade I started to write poems inspired from the readings I did. The school principal and later on my English proffesor followed up with me in my career as a good reader.
Before we properly begin, it might be prudent to demolish the possibility of literary laziness or carelessness birthing these loose ends. Any reader of Shaw’s other works will undoubtedly acknowledge him as anything but a lazy writer - great thought and research has evidently gone into his other works and it logically follows this play warrants equal investment. Furthermore, a cursory examination of the text itself indicates high audience awareness evident in the self-censorship Shaw employs in his language. In constructing Mrs Warren’s Profession, he alludes to and hints at Kitty Warren’s profession but never