Separate and Inequal: a Marxist Viewing of the Devil Wears Prada

1574 Words7 Pages
The 2006 movie The Devil Wears Prada is a film that emphasizes and makes a commentary about the differences between people of different classes, and the capitalist society that encourages it. Throughout the course of the movie, the viewer is explicitly reminded of the distinct differences in wealth, power, and class between the likes of Miranda Priestly and those who work for her. The movie stresses the differences between the bourgeois Priestly and her proletariat underlings, which are highlighted through the differences in lifestyle between their social circles and Priestly’s interactions with her subordinates. This difference also demonstrates that if it is possible to set aside the artificial divide caused by money in a capitalist society, people are essentially equals. A Marxist critique of the film suggests that through the use of these images and ideas, The Devil Wears Prada emphasizes the existence of clear class distinctions while challenging the acceptability of the current social order. Marxist literary theory examines a text from an economic standpoint. It argues that economic relations define human social interactions. Marxist theory also argues that those who are in high social position maintain the standing social order by convincing the majority that the standing social order is just. The cinematic direction of The Devil Wears Prada takes care to highlight the differences in lifestyle between the two groups of people portrayed in the film. The stark differences shown between both the home and social spaces of Andy’s original social circle and that of Miranda’s highlight the idea of a nearly inseparable boundary between the social and economic elite as opposed to common citizens. Andy and her friends repeatedly socialize in what appears to be a typical crowded bar, conveying the image often associated with the dirty hustle and bustle of the
Open Document