Safeguarding: Every Child Matters (CAF)

6247 Words25 Pages
Safeguarding Although the philosophy of the Act is that the child is best brought up in their own families, at times this is not in the best interests of the child. The LA has a duty to safeguard and promote the child’s welfare (s.22(3)). (CA(1989)The overarching principle of the Act is that the welfare of the child is paramount (s.1) regardless of race, religion or culture. Although section 22(5)[c]) of the Act it states that the local authorities must consider “the child's religious persuasion, racial origin and cultural and linguistic background”, this only applies to looked after children (Brammer 2007). Under the Race Relations (Amendment Act) 2000, LA’s have a duty to promote good race relations and equality, provide a culturally sensitive…show more content…
Additionally, they can be used to evaluate progress within parenting capacities, particularly if key areas were targeted for improvement, thus determining whether the needs of the child will be sufficiently met if they are to return to their own home environment (Ibid 2000b). The Common Assessment Framework (CAF) as proposed by Every Child Matters (2007), is a relatively new standardised approach for assessing the need for services for children and is part of a wider government programme to provide integrated services including the need to improve multi-agency working. The CAF is a common language in assessment and is based upon the five outcomes of Every Child Matters (Brammer 2007). Every Child Matters raises questions of where LAC should be (or get to) in relation to other children. The agenda aims to improve the lives of LAC holistically across the five outcomes linking to the Articles in the UNCRC (Unicef 2006a). The objective is to improve and integrate children's services, promote early intervention, provide strong leadership, bringing together different professionals in multi-disciplinary teams in order to achieve positive outcomes for children, using a matrix of specialist, targeted and universal services built around their…show more content…
She notes four different value positions; ‘liassaz-faire’, ‘state paternalism’, ‘parent’s rights’ and ‘children’s rights’. The latter two are appropriate here. Firstly, she notes that the perspective of ‘parent’s rights’ acts as a belief that the state should positively intervene to adequately provide family support and assistance to enable the child to be brought up in the home. This includes providing accommodation on a voluntary basis for children as a last resort, with significant emphasis on maintaining parental contact and returning home (where
Open Document