Rhetorical Analysis Of Julius Caesar

1550 Words7 Pages
Caesar was one of the greatest generals to ever live. He shaped the borders of Rome, along with its laws. His Commentaries are considered some of the greatest works in the ancient world. He wrote them to keep Rome updated on his actions outside of Italy. They were intended to persuade his critics and reassure his supporters that he was doing all that was possible to protect the Republic. Publishing summaries of his campaigns was one of the best ways to record his successes, which were numerous, so that literate and wealthy citizens could hear of his accomplishments. His rhetorical audience would be all Roman citizens. However, the ones who would learn of his actions first would obviously be the Senate, considering it was the ruling body…show more content…
Whenever he described an enemy he made them appear as though they were war mad barbarians out to destroy the fragile balance of Roman power in Gaul. This played on the common belief that most Romans had that everybody in Gaul was bloodthirsty and willing to kill whenever. Most of the times, with the use of hindsight, we can see that Caesar had ulterior motives. However, at the time it seemed like whatever he did was only to protect Rome. Along with depicting Gauls and Germans as bloodthirsty barbarians, he also used his own soldiers to stir emotions in his readers. He would never use the word soldiers, or “milites,” in Latin, to describe his men. Instead he would always refer to them as “our men.” This would stir most Romans that read it because of the intense atmosphere of nationalism present throughout most of Rome’s history. Another way he used pathos was by making the leaders of other peoples seem evil. In his first book he talked of Orgetorix and the Helvetii. These Gaulish people had planned a massive migration, lead by Orgetorix. Along with the massive migration it is said that Orgetorix also conspired with other tribal leaders to make it so that he would be an extremely powerful figure in Gaul, ruling most of it. This arrangement was done in secret and Caesar capitalized on that. With another case of his well thought out pathos, he described the sinister nature of the deal. Romans despised sneakiness and it was considered an extremely evil act to conspire in secret with others. So, Caesar exploited the perceptions of the time and gave himself a valid reason to attack the

More about Rhetorical Analysis Of Julius Caesar

Open Document