Although a shocking event in both adaptations, the color version better fit the mood of the attack on Caesar’s life. In the black and white version, the obvious lack of color creates a scene that is less gory, and therefore, less captivating. Along with that, the colored version portrays the assassination taking place in front of a crowd of senators, which provides a more exciting scene. The gory, chaotic scene depicted in the colored version provides a higher level of excitement that is far more effective than the black and white version. Another difference can be seen in the approach of the actors and their portrayals of their respective characters.
The Heroic Coward Throughout the story The Red Badge of Courage by Stephan Crane, the actions and attitude of the protagonist, Private Henry Fleming constantly change. In the beginning of the book Henry would be considered a hero for enlisting in the army. In the middle and the end of the book Henry changes from a hero to a coward. He continuously ran away during the battles and he also fakes an injury in the attempt to receive a Red Badge of Courage. First Henry decides to enlist into the army which takes place in the first chapter of the book.
Saving Private Ryan became an instant critical and commercial hit in the US, although the success did not come without controversy. The film was criticized by some for its extreme violence and depiction of Germans, while others, including veterans of WWII, praised the depiction of battle conditions, especially the opening D-Day invasion scene. Many such as Roy Metcalf make the argument that Saving Private Ryan honors veterans with its story of bravery and sacrifice, while others such as Brien Hallet look at the film as an expression of chauvinism, which supports a blind enthusiasm for military glory. Although Hallet makes some good points, it is hard for me to not see Saving Private Ryan as a tribute to all the brave Americans that served in WWII. The plot of Saving Private Ryan is one that is difficult for some to grasp.
I had hoped the relationship between Biff, played by John Malkovich, and Willy was clearer. The movie did show the distance between the two characters but it didn’t really define their failures. I expected Howard, played by Jon Polito, to be a lot younger and smaller in the movie. He was the total opposite which was bigger and bigger. All in all, Schlondorff did a great job directing and the actors did an even better job showing the personalities and emotions of each
If the movie had more detail it would be more interesting. The book gave me a better picture. When I saw the movie it confused me because it didn’t have all the parts. If I just saw the movie I wouldn’t understand why Greasers and Socs were separated and why they hated each other. I think Cherry did a really good job; she fit the description really well I think.
Same thing for action or adventure movies, I do not like movies where there is some person who appears rather weak, but is still able to beat up hundreds of well trained soldiers. Lastly, the movies that I perhaps most enjoy are movies that make you think and wonder what is happening and going on as the film moves on. So movies with very good twists that you do not see coming are usually pretty enjoyable for me as a viewer. At first when I saw the previews for the movie I did not think much of it. First of all, I am not a big Jake Gyllenhaal
He doesn’t notice how fast he runs, but is discovered by a group of college football coaches that are willing to give him a full scholarship if he plays on their team. Although his mental handicap, he is given the opportunity to obtain a college degree. After college, Forrest chooses to join the military, spending years in Vietnam fighting. While fighting, his battalion meets a situation with gunfire and grenades all exploding all around them. Using his ability to run, he ran and ran until he carried members into safety.
Me and my classmates were fed all those great examples of people fighting during Second World War sacrificing their lives and not even dare to look for any kind of reward other then admitting them into “hero ranks” of their “great” country. Fighting for reward was not hero like behavior. I realize though that this understanding of hero was more due to the norms and obligations of certain time and society. In “The Iliad” hero is noted for his courage and strength and desire to fight especially if they risk their life or put it in any kind of danger. But at the same time Homer also pays great attention to rewards, heroes get for their fighting.
Shows with less multiple threading are easy to understand, because you can predict the ending most of the time. The narrative complexity is mental gymnastics which is good for the brain. Multiple threading is a big part of making you think more on shows which makes you smarter. In addition to multiple threading, Johnson believes that television makes you smarter because it makes you think more than it previously did. The author believes that the sleeper curve is very beneficial to our mental development.
This is a regrettable thing, for the original is always better than a copy. However this does not diminish Robin Hood Prince of Thieves in any way even although the plot has been slightly rearranged. Even though the humour is slightly more suited for older responders the film generally rolls together. On the other hand, Robin Hood is everything the stereotypical hero should be. It is a little obvious to older responders that this movie would end with the hero going out with a trill of fanfare.