Rationalization and Bureaucracy

545 Words3 Pages
Rationalization must be understood in relation to Weber’s broader concept of reason. The term s most often associated with social action and structures emphasizing demystification, exact calculation, prediction and quantification concerning the means of action. This meaning is reflected in Weber’s useof “instrumentally rational action (1968:71-4), “technical rationality” (1968:63-8) “rational economic action” (1968:71-4), “ formal rationality (1968:851-6). Value rational action (1968:24-6) and “substantive rationality” (1968:85-6) which involve reflection about ultimate ends. Weber’s concept of rationalization refers to the “disenchantment” of the world-the displacement of “magical elements of thought”by ideas which “gain in systematic coherence and naturalistic consistency”. Rationalization should be interpreted, in the broader sense as the intensification of means-oriented reason in social and technical organization as well as action/thought Formal rationality of economic action…used to designate the extent of quantitative calculation or account which is technically possible and which is actually applied” and substantive rationality involving the degree to twhich the provisioning of given groups of persons…with goods is shaped by economically oriented social action udner some criterion (past, present or potential) of ultimate values regardless of the nature of these ends. “the maximum of formal rationality in capital accounting is possible only wehre workers are ubjected to domination by enrepreneurs” Weber asserts that his “is a futher specific element of substantive irrationality in the modern economic order’ Domination: the situation in which the manifested will (command) of the ruler or rulers is meant to influence the conduct of one or more others (the ruled) and actually does influence it in such a way that their conduct to a socially relevant degree
Open Document