Because of the concern over the high campaign costs people have tried to find solutions. In 1938 Common Cause tried to have Congress pass a law so that PAC’s wouldn’t be so financially involved in elections. Elections are very expensive and when campaigns are privately funded it gives them an unfair advantage. It becomes unfair because the wealthy candidate will most likely win. Another thing is the candidate will be under the control of the elite.
And the Judicial branch explains the laws as well as checking to make sure all laws are constitutional. Thus, creating checks and balances which allows all three branches to check the powers of the other branches to prevent any certain branch from becoming too powerful. This limits the presidents’ powers due to the powers of the other branches. For instance, the judicial branch can rule an action by the president unconstitutional, and the legislative branch can over-ride a presidents’ veto at any one
Our politicians have a great influence over what the media reports as well. At times the role of the media and the influence of politicians collide. Who wins out in the end is a complicated matter and is a very hot topic at present. I will elaborate on this idea and conclude with my thoughts on the “conservatives” charge that the media in general has a very liberal bias. The word “media” can be described many different ways, in both a positive and negative light.
Anything that goes against what the corporate powers that be is demonized and twisted into a different form through their media outlets to create something that the ill-informed will swallow it no questions asked. Anyone that speaks out against what is obviously wrong with the system is turned into an enemy, while the one’s violating our rights and freedoms are treated like benevolent kings. Recently there have been many successful efforts to subjugate the poorer voters in this country. These measures have passed and it will become difficult for poorer and elderly people to vote in this country. The reason for this is simple, poor people and minorities are more likely to vote for Obama in the coming election and they have more numbers than those that will not.
In Boumediene versus Bush case, the court voted that the detainees have the right to habeas corpus, because Cuba’s base is technically American territory. Chief Justice Roberts is against the majority vote. His thoughts are that the court is “overreaching” and fears that the decision made by non-political and non-accountable judges might strain the control of the nations on foreign policies. (Greenhouse, L., 2008) The role of the President as commander in chief is to put in force “laws passed by the Congress”. (Levin-Waldman, O.M., 2012, p.48) He also can do whatever he feels is needed to “protect and defend the Constitution”.
While some citizens would prefer that governmental leaders implement spending cuts while others would favor an increase in revenue, as a practical matter the country’s precarious financial situation cannot be addressed exclusively by just one of these options. (Bartels). The electoral process is rather difficult due to its complex organization. It requires the parties that share it to create valid political campaigns that would be quite persuasive. Usually, the election represents the competition between two major parties – the Democratic and Republican.
And they’re right they should. But the fact that the country was attacked by people who easily incorporated themselves into the nations daily life raised a huge problem. And that’s when people started to wonder how much intrusion of citizens lives should the government be allowed in order to provide protection for the citizens of the United States. The expansion of government power is a bitter acceptance for fellow Americans. The reason I say that is because when the power of the government expands people tend to put more trust into state and local governments rather than the federal government.
The President has the power to veto a proposed legislation, forcing Congress to pass it again with a 2/3 majority or else let it die. He is Commander in Chief of the armed forces and the state militia. The President ensures that the laws of Congress are "faithfully executed". He appoints, with the Senate's consent, the heads of the executive departments and may pardon people convicted of federal crimes. He makes treaties with the advice and consent of the Senate, also he meets with foreign heads of state.
With this system, the judicial branch, the Supreme Court, can check Congress by declaring laws unconstitutional. The executive branch, the president, can check Congress by vetoing bills they have passed in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The president checks the judicial branch by appointing Federal judges, but the Senate must agree with a majority vote for it to go through. Congress can check both the president and members of the Court with its power of impeachment. Officials could be impeached by Congress for treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
Presidential Powers I think the president has some things that he does have power over and should have power over. The three things he should have power over is veto laws, grant pardon, and appointment judges. Veto law is that the president has rights to delay a bill from becoming a law. Grant pardon is to release a person from punishment or disfavor. Lastly appointment judges is that the president choses judges from his following appointment lists.