Plato Allegory of the Cave

1080 Words5 Pages
Plato Allegory of the Cave- Connections #6 The “Allegory of the Cave” describes how people are unable to adapt, change, and grow both intellectually and ethically; that includes us individually and as a society. People are trapped by their inability to accept change whenever they are presented with the scenario that what they perceive is false, and that what they thought they know, is also false. They think that what they perceive is actual reality and that they cannot think beyond the traps of their own mind because accepting what they believe is wrong would call for change, growth, and ultimately acceptance of what they believe is and was inherently wrong. When the prisoner escapes this leads him to truly understand the mental traps that were set forth upon him and he begins to understand that goodness isn’t just in the visual concepts of the sun, trees, or air. He understands that the goodness he gained was from his ability to change and adept his views and truly not rely on just the simple objects of reality around him. Compared to the other philosophies of both Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli, Plato is generally different from both, even though there are contrasting views in all three of the philosophies. Plato and Lao-Tzu certainly have much more in-common with their philosophies than that of Plato and Machiavelli. Part of Plato’s philosophy as it relates to government is man’s ability to adapt and change around them and be able to mold the government to achieve Plato’s idea of “goodness.” Lao-Tzu ideally views a goverment that doesn’t intrude into its people’s live. It lets the people govern themselves mostly, holding that “when a master governs, the people are hardly aware he exists.” (pg. 22, Jacobus) Machiavelli is quite different in his views. Machiavelli does accept that change is necessary in government. He believes that a leader who is unwilling to grow

More about Plato Allegory of the Cave

Open Document