This is a historic federalism versus state rights conflict that has defined our nation throughout our entire history and continues to divide us politically, as evidenced in the recent presidential election. Thus, we rank high in many critical care and surgical services, but rank low in overall morbidity and mortality rates due our lack of comprehensive horizontally integrated healthcare services that extend far beyond our hospital borders. We spend approximately 18.4 percent of our gross domestic product (GDP) on healthcare, which is almost double that of any other industrialized nation. Part A of the Medicare Trust Fund is due to go bankrupt in 2017. The need to offer higher healthcare quality and service at lower costs requires incentives for innovative delivery systems and new ways of working with fewer resources.
The non-profit was motivation to provide assistance to the poor in need with different health conditions and those in broken communities that are intended to suffer in health. Research findings report that eighty-five percent non-profit hospitals are involved in charitable missions (Smith, 2011). For a rebuttable, for-profit organization share that they raise more money for investing in charity care as well (Smith, 2011). The American Hospitals Association clarifies that the charity contribution between non-profit and for-profit hospitals is a small difference when it comes to “uncompensated care” (Smith, 2011). Non-profit hospitals have been involved in minor issues as eligibility is questioned when filing for tax exemptions.
I have never personally needed a transplant, nor thought that if I didn’t need a certain organ I could just go and sell it. However there are thousands of people every day that are in severe need of one. What’s the big deal for a few bucks for an organ removal? Why is it so hard to help someone out, but for the ones that need the organ, and for the ones receiving the money? In “Yes, Let’s Pay for Organs”, Charles Krauthammer argues the fact that receiving money for donated organs from the dead is an ethnical proposition.
He said that if the government had a better organ system, there will be a decreased rate of people dying each year and lesser medical cost paid by the government. Halpern also conclude that having an organ market would totally boost organ donors (Huchison 1). The way I understand his statement, he is basically blaming the current organ system for the increasing number of people dying each year waiting for an organ to be donated. His reason doesn’t change my point of view. I think the government of U.S. should reject the idea to start an organ market in the
Sanchez also was planning an expansion of Elijah Heart Center into a total heart care center for the patients that would be completely modernized and capable of caring for the patient’s needs for many years to come. Three options were available for Mr. Sanchez to choose from. 1) Tax exempt revenue bonds, 2) HUD 242 loan insurance program, and 3) Private bank funding. It is a better suggestion to go with the HUD 242 loan insurance program. The HUD 242 program has the lowest interest rate of the 3 options but the main reason for suggesting this option is that compared to bank loans which sometimes treats hospital loans as junk; the HUD 242 gives the financing an investment grade of AA or AAA.
Currently, only 15 percent of pharmaceutical corporation costs are on research and development and 35 percent of costs are on marketing (Hall). If government controlled the healthcare system private corporations would not be forced to waste their money on competitive business tactics. Instead the funds allocated to advertising and lobbying could be used towards more progressive research and development. Government provided healthcare could possibly reduce the cost of medication in the long term by abolishing the cost of marketing for pharmaceutical
Then the insurance will pay their eighty percent of the hundred dollars and the patient is billed for the remaining twenty percent. For IVF and other ART patients there is no insurance involvement so physicians can charge what ever they want for their services and there is nothing that can be said about it. An average cycle of IVF in the United States cost between 10,000 and 15,000 dollars. Also on average the first cycle is generally not successful. This leads to several patients who would normally only transfer a single embryo or at most two to elect transferring more.
The results of this study came out to be exactly what they were afraid of. It is not a coincidence that the referral rate is higher in physician owned practices. This initiation of therapy by the physician clearly proves that they are in it for simply for the money and not for the health of the patient. 575 million dollars each year is lost in California due to physical therapy compensation costs and “generates approximately $233 million per year in services delivered for economic rather than clinical reasons.” This is hurting everyone involved as well as many who are not involved. Each state as a whole is losing much needed money and it is going down the drain due to these physician owned practices.
Out of every paycheck, a percentage is taken out and contributed to the government health coverage system. This portion taken out of a paycheck is proportional to the amount of the paycheck. This raises many concerns with the higher earning Americans who pay more into health coverage, yet can afford their own health insurance. Medicaid is for the poor, yet paid for by the rich who are not always the most willing participants. Emma Greene, an eighteen year old girl fighting cystic fibrosis, is also the daughter of two very poor immigrants from Europe.
The significant difference between the rates of health insurance cost increases and wage and inflation increases creates a problem in itself. Not only are there millions of people without health insurance, it is becoming more likely that they will not be able to afford to hold insurance policy. However, in a 2002 study it was found that only 30% of the uninsured were below federal poverty levels (Overview of the U.S. Health Care System). This means that despite the unsettling amounts of people in poverty without health insurance, there is also the issue of those who have the means to provide themselves and their families with health insurance and choose not to, only to be faced with crippling health bills should anything go wrong. Navigating and deciphering the complicated health insurance industry is too daunting and expensive a task to leave up to individuals, which is why in many cases, the United States government and private organizations have stepped in.